Feeds

123-reg shrugs off customer complaints over stealth domain transfer charges

Web hosting provider quietly abandons free promise

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Web hosting outfit 123-reg has dismissed a number of complaints from disgruntled customers who are angry with the company's sudden decision to abandon its promise to keep domain transfers free on its service.

The Register heard from a family-run website business, The Mayne Design, which griped about the stealth changes to 123-reg's fees in a blog post entitled "domain names held hostage".

Companies who pay for domain names via 123-reg are now being told that they have to pay for any changes made to Internet Provider Security (IPS) tags, which are used by Dot-UK registry Nominet to flag the hosting outfit linked to a specific .uk domain name.

But critics are disappointed with 123-reg for suddenly reneging on its promise not to charge for tweaks to the IPS. It has now set a fee of £9.99, plus VAT, for any such changes.

"[S]imply put, 123-reg slapped on the charge without telling anyone, probably hoping that nobody would notice," The Mayne Design claimed.

It added that the hosting company had promised as recently as late March that there would be "no hidden charges to transfer away."

Another fed up 123-reg punter told el Reg: I have been a customer of 123-Reg for years but feel completed mistreated and feel it's dishonest on their part. I am now going to be moving my whole domain portfolio including .coms etc to another registrar."

We asked Nominet to comment on this story, but it has yet to get in touch.

123-reg said it had made a change to the default way .uk transfers were handled. A spokesman told us:

The update was made two weeks ago without notable customer impact. 123-reg has more than 1 million customers and has seen discussion on this from a very small number of them.

Our contact centres have seen no impact, our social teams likewise - other than those customers you have noted. This change to our product is not directly customer impacting, and the fees involved in this service are equal to those charged by the registry concerned for the same service.

®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
New EU digi-commish struggles with concepts of net neutrality
Oettinger all about the infrastructure – but not big on substance
PEAK IPV4? Global IPv6 traffic is growing, DDoS dying, says Akamai
First time the cache network has seen drop in use of 32-bit-wide IP addresses
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.