Feeds

123-reg shrugs off customer complaints over stealth domain transfer charges

Web hosting provider quietly abandons free promise

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Web hosting outfit 123-reg has dismissed a number of complaints from disgruntled customers who are angry with the company's sudden decision to abandon its promise to keep domain transfers free on its service.

The Register heard from a family-run website business, The Mayne Design, which griped about the stealth changes to 123-reg's fees in a blog post entitled "domain names held hostage".

Companies who pay for domain names via 123-reg are now being told that they have to pay for any changes made to Internet Provider Security (IPS) tags, which are used by Dot-UK registry Nominet to flag the hosting outfit linked to a specific .uk domain name.

But critics are disappointed with 123-reg for suddenly reneging on its promise not to charge for tweaks to the IPS. It has now set a fee of £9.99, plus VAT, for any such changes.

"[S]imply put, 123-reg slapped on the charge without telling anyone, probably hoping that nobody would notice," The Mayne Design claimed.

It added that the hosting company had promised as recently as late March that there would be "no hidden charges to transfer away."

Another fed up 123-reg punter told el Reg: I have been a customer of 123-Reg for years but feel completed mistreated and feel it's dishonest on their part. I am now going to be moving my whole domain portfolio including .coms etc to another registrar."

We asked Nominet to comment on this story, but it has yet to get in touch.

123-reg said it had made a change to the default way .uk transfers were handled. A spokesman told us:

The update was made two weeks ago without notable customer impact. 123-reg has more than 1 million customers and has seen discussion on this from a very small number of them.

Our contact centres have seen no impact, our social teams likewise - other than those customers you have noted. This change to our product is not directly customer impacting, and the fees involved in this service are equal to those charged by the registry concerned for the same service.

®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
EE: STILL Blighty's best mobe network, says 'Frappucino' Moore
Fresh round of network stats fisticuffs possibly on the cards here
US TV stations bowl sueball directly at FCC's spectrum mega-sale
Broadcasters upset about coverage and cost as they shift up and down the dials
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?