Feeds

Google facing $5 BEEELLION antitrust fine in India

No settlement on the cards this time for the Chocolate Factory

Security for virtualized datacentres

Google may be in the midst of securing a deal on its long-running search dispute with the European Union, but it’s still facing a possible $US5bn (£3bn) fine from the Competition Commission of India (CCI) over allegations it has abused its market leading position in the internet search space.

Local laws state that the CCI can impose a fine of up to 10 per cent of annual turnover, which is calculated as an average over three years. For the Chocolate Factory those revenues top a whopping $49bn over the three year period.

The CCI also has the power to order a company found to be too dominant to be broken down into smaller businesses.

The antitrust watchdog’s investigation arm, the Director General (DG), has been investigating Google for over two years now after a complaint by consumer rights group CUTS (Consumer Unity and Trust Society), filed back in 2011.

This was followed by another complaint by specialist wedding site matrimony.com, according to PTI.

Although Google has settled antitrust cases in the US, and recently with the EU, India’s rules are slightly different.

There’s apparently no settlement process for antitrust cases brought before the CCI and complaints can’t be withdrawn.

In any case, the complaints brought in India differ slightly from those investigated by regulators elsewhere.

"Google's unfair use of trademarks as well as its retaliatory conduct are not specifically addressed in the European settlement and are distinct theories of harm being pursued by the CCI,” matrimony.com lawyer Ferida Satarawala said.

“Therefore, this [EU] settlement is unlikely to address CCI's concerns in our case.”

For its part, a Google statement sent to PTI had the following:

We are extending full co-operation to the Competition Commission of India in their investigation. We're pleased that the conclusion of the Federal Trade Commission's two year review was that Google's services are good for users and good for competition.

This isn’t the first time Google has come under the scrutiny of the Indian authorities.

In November 2012 it was accused of misleading the government, violating accounting rules and hit with a Rs.76 crore (£8.7m) fine.

The Director General is expected to report its findings to the CCI soon. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.