Feeds

Cost-slashing Sony axes 1,000 workers and 20 stores in US

Bosses insist layoffs 'absolutely necessary' as billion-dollar loss looms for the year

The essential guide to IT transformation

Sony Electronics announced that it will shut 20 of the 31 stores it operates in the US and lay off 1,000 workers – a third of its workforce.

The entertainment giant said the redundancies are part of Sony Corp's wider cash-cutting program, which will axe 5,000 jobs worldwide and kicked off at the start of February. Back then, it forecast a ¥110bn loss ($1.07bn, £665m) for its financial year to March 2014.

The move announced today will leave the tech goliath with just 11 shops in the States. Five of the remaining stores will be in California, all but one in the San Diego and Los Angeles area. Three stores will stay open in New York, along with two Florida locations and a store in Houston, Texas.

Among the stores set to close are Sony storefronts in Washington state, Virginia, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Illinois, and Massachusetts.

"While these moves were extremely tough, they were absolutely necessary to position us in the best possible place for future growth," said Mike Fasulo, president and chief operating officer of Sony Electronics.

"I am entirely confident in our ability to turn the business around, in achieving our preferred future, and continue building on our flawless commitment to customer loyalty through the complete entertainment experience only Sony can offer."

Sony Corporation said earlier this month it will overhaul its PC and TV businesses in a series of cuts and moves that will include the sale of the Vaio brand. Those cuts will bring the loss of 5,000 jobs, 3,500 of which will be to business units in the US. The global biz banked a $458m net income on $72bn revenues in its fiscal year that ended Match 2013. In the previous year, it made a $4.4bn loss on $63bn sales.

Sony is not the only big name which has been shedding staff as of late. IBM began the first of what could be as many as 15,000 job cuts, while Dell has been reluctant to say just how many of its employees are being sacked as part of its rebuilding efforts. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.