Feeds

Just how much bang does a FAS8040 box give you for 500,000 bucks

New NetApp array test-driven in SPC-1 benchmark

High performance access to file storage

Blocks and Files A just-announced two-node NetApp FAS8040 cluster scored 86,072.33 IOPS [PDF] on the SPC-1 random I/O storage benchmark, with linear scale-out extrapolation suggesting it could do better than the FAS6240's performance.

The list price for the system was a smidgen below half a million bucks at $495,652.43, giving a list price/performance rating of $5.76/IOPS.

There was 84.2TB of configured storage capacity, using 450GB 10,000rpm SAS drives, and the configuration included two 512GB PCIe flash cards, one per node acting as a flash cache. The 8040 can have up to 12TB of flash as a virtual storage tier, but the SPC configuration doesn't list any such memory as a line item.

FAS8040 SPC-1 storage capacity graph

FAS8040 SPC-1 storage capacity

NetApp suggests that its FAS8000’s performance grows linearly as nodes are added to a cluster. A six-node FAS6240 – part of NetApp’s top end FAS6200 range, the FAS8000 being a mid-range array – achieved 250,039.67 SPC-1 IOPS. So, multiplying the two-node FAS8040 result by three to get a hypothetical six-node FAS8040 result, we get 258,216.99 IOPS, more than the actual FAS6240 result. Interesting, especially as there is a faster FAS8060 in the 8000 range.

Back to reality, here’s a table showing the FAS8040 result and nine systems below it:

FAS8040 SPC-1

FAS8040 SPC-1 IOPS results and some below it

Let’s look at the systems immediately above the FAS8040:

Top ten SPC-1 IOPS systems with FAS8040 at bottom

Nine systems better than the FAS8040 on SPC-1 IOPS

The FAS8040 is better than a tested Storwize V7000 configuration using disk drives but less good than an all-flash V7000; that's hardly surprising.

The most desirable comparison, with an EMC VNX, is not possible as EMC isn't exposing that system to SPC-1 benchmark visibility. HP's 3PAR F400 is faster than the NetApp array but not by much. As it's a 2009 vintage design it's not that relevant.

We're left feeling disappointed. Let's load an 8040 up with flash and see what happens. Let's try out a six-node 8060, loaded with flash, and see how that performs. There must be more to come, surely? ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Seagate brings out 6TB HDD, did not need NO STEENKIN' SHINGLES
Or helium filling either, according to reports
European Court of Justice rips up Data Retention Directive
Rules 'interfering' measure to be 'invalid'
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Cisco reps flog Whiptail's Invicta arrays against EMC and Pure
Storage reseller report reveals who's selling what
Bored with trading oil and gold? Why not flog some CLOUD servers?
Chicago Mercantile Exchange plans cloud spot exchange
Just what could be inside Dropbox's new 'Home For Life'?
Biz apps, messaging, photos, email, more storage – sorry, did you think there would be cake?
IT bods: How long does it take YOU to train up on new tech?
I'll leave my arrays to do the hard work, if you don't mind
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.