Feeds

Huawei's TOP MUTANT smashes aside puny SPC-1 contenders

Crushes the competition for hybrid arrays

Security for virtualized datacentres

Huawei has crushed the SPC-1 benchmark lists for hybrid SDD-HDD arrays with its OceanStor 18800 delivering over a million IOPS.

SPC-1 benchmarks are used to test the random I/O performance of a storage array, and Kaminario claims the top two spots with all flash and all-DRAM K2 arrays.

Huawei’s hot box delivered 1.005,893.43 SPC-1 IOPS with an average response time of 5.17 millisecs at 100 per cent load. It delivered more IOPS than an all-flash HDS VSP array, which limped behind, relatively speaking, at 602,019.47 IOPS, though it was faster with an average response time of 0.72 milliseconds.

The chart shows the top SPC-1 scores.

SPC-1 numbers

Top-14 SPC-1 IOPS scores.

Ignore the price/performance; it’s based on list pricing and few people buy systems performing at this level at list price.

The OceanStor hardware used 16 controllers, 1,344 x 3.5-inch SAS disk drives, and 192 x 2.5-inch SSDs, all managed by the VXE OS. There was 35.9TB of flash, 4.25 per cent of the overall capacity, compared to 343.1TB of storage pool disk and another 343.1TB of mirrored data protection capacity. Get more configuration details here.

Huawei says the 18800 has a SmartTier feature which automatically analyses data access frequency and migrates data to the right storage tier, choosing between SSD, SAS and NL-SAS disk drives. The flash is used for fast access data, SAS disks for middlingly active data and the nearline-SAS disks for the least active data.

Admin staff can:

  • Specify the statistical period - hour or day
  • Choose the migration data size - from 256 KB to 64 MB
  • Select automatic or manual migration mode
  • Decide on the migration period and speed

There had been a school of thought that said a hybrid flash-disk array wouldn't be able to crack the million-plus IOPS level on the SPC-1 benchmark. And with an all-flash top-end HDS VSP array only reaching 602,019.47 IOPS that thought seemed solid. Not any more.

The VSP had 42.221TB of configured storage capacity, so we can't say the OceanStor 18800 bested it by overloading on flash, as it had a smaller amount, 35.9TB.

If your workload is SPC-1-like, and you need stacks of disk capacity as well as performance then this Huawei machine is a hot, hot box. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
VMware's tool to harden virtual networks: a spreadsheet
NSX security guide lands in intriguing format
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.