Feeds

Swollen-bellied Riverbed spears trout of doubt: Opnet buyout blues over

Offers up fresh Steelhead DX8000

Website security in corporate America

Riverbed, the WAN optimising and cloud storage gateway biz, has announced a sparkling new Steelhead appliance and pretty shiny results as it recovers from digesting an acquisition. Which first? Let’s go for the revenues and earnings.

Fourth quarter 2013 revenues were $283m – satisfying growth compared to revenues of $262m in the previous quarter and $238m a year ago. Profits, though, were another matter. They were just $8m - 2.8 per cent of revenues - which contrasts to a 6-8 per cent margin in 2011 and 2012. The previous quarters saw profits of $3.8m and a year ago Riverbed reported $5m in profits. Things are getting better.

Revenues for the full year were $1bn, nicely up on the previous year’s $837m, but net income (profit) for 2013 was a loss of $12m. There had been a profit of $55m for 2012. Something went awry.

Three charts provide snapshot glimpses of the revenues and profit/loss picture. First, quarterly revenues and profit/loss to the end of 2013:

Riverbed results to end-2013

Click the pic to get bigger look.

Now let’s look at profits/losses as a percentage of revenue: this is revealing.

Riverbed net income as percentage of revenue

Something dreadful happened to net income after the third quarter of 2012, with a presaging of the problems in the first quarter.

Finally, the annual revenues and profits graph shows the overall perspective, with quarterly fluctuations, and illustrates Riverbed’s financial issues.

Riverbed annual numbers to 2013

The conclusions from these three charts?

  • Starting in 2012 there was a first quarter profits dip and the recovery in the second and third quarters wasn’t sustained with a small profit in the fourth quarter and then …
  • Two quarters of losses in the first half of 2013, a thin profit in the third quarter and slightly better one on the final quarter.
  • Annual revenues have been rising steadily but net income went awry in 2012 and turned into a loss on 2013. Cost controls simply fell apart in 2012 and still haven’t recovered.

Riverbed bought Opnet Technologies, a network traffic management company, for $1bn in late 2012, and the after-effects of integrating that acquisition have included relatively uncontrolled spending.

Riverbed founder, chairman and CEO Jerry Kenelly talked of the Opnet digestion problems in a November 2013 analysts' meeting, mentioning:

  • Big move – merging 700 people into 1800 people
  • Inherently challenging and costly
  • Still Recent – less than 1 year in total
  • 2 quarters “feet on the stree”,
  • Some impact from Government unrest
  • Largely complete as 2014 approaches

The company said WAN optimisation was becoming a commodity market (= lower margins) and so it redefined itself as a location-independent computing company in November last year – an attempt to break out of the WAN optimisation niche. Opnet is a key part of this.

The outlook for 2014 is brighter and Riverbed is now moving ahead again, with its new appliance part of that.

Brand new Steelhead

Kennelly said in November: “With Steelhead, SaaS apps like Microsoft Office 365 can be delivered up to 33 times faster while using 97 per cent less bandwidth.”

Steelheads are claimed to deliver up to 60x WAN performance acceleration and up to 99 per cent bandwidth reduction. They come in EX branch office connect versions, CX larger branch office and a data centre variants, and, now, a DX data centre-to-data centre box.

This is the Steelhead DX Edition 8000 Series, designed for use in datacenter-to-datacenter data replication. It features:

  • Up to 2 Gbit/s of optimised WAN capacity
  • Up to 10 Gbit/s of optimised LAN capacity
  • It optimises up to 10,000 TCP and UDP application flows
  • Optimisations for data replication applications such as NetApp SnapMirror and EMC Symmetrix Remote Data Facility (SRDF)

You can get a specsheet here (small pdf).

The Steelhead DX 8000 is available now. ®

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Hey, Scots. Microsoft's Bing thinks you'll vote NO to independence
World's top Google-finding website calls it for the UK
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
Apple CEO Tim Cook: TV is TERRIBLE and stuck in the 1970s
The iKing thinks telly is far too fiddly and ugly – basically, iTunes
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Huawei ditches new Windows Phone mobe plans, blames poor sales
Giganto mobe firm slams door shut on Microsoft. OH DEAR
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
OECD lashes out at tax avoiding globocorps' location-flipping antics
You hear that, Amazon, Google, Microsoft et al?
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.