Feeds

Bletchley Park spat 'halts work on rare German cipher machine'

Trust denies claims that priceless working Lorenz device left unmaintained...

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

An engineer has claimed the war between the Bletchley Park Trust and the National Museum of Computing has prevented him from repairing one of the few WWII German cipher machines that remain in working order.

On GreenKeys, a mailing list dedicated to the discussion of older radio teletype (RTTY) gear, engineer Craig Sawyers warned the "total mess" at Bletchley was hampering the conservation of priceless World War II artefacts.

Sawyers worked on the restoration of the German-made Lorenz SZ42, which the Nazis used to transmit coded messages, and claimed the ongoing tensions between Bletchley Park and the National Museum of Computing have prevented him from continuing his work.

The mailing list letter read: "The continuing, blood on the walls dispute essentially locks me out of repairing the only functional SZ42 on the planet."

The letter continued, saying that he had brought the machine to a cipher challenge in Germany five years ago. But when it was switched on in Germany, the mains transformer blew.

"It was kind of ironic," Sawyers added.

Visitors to Bletchley Park used to also be shown around the National Museum of Computing, a separate institution which houses the Colossus code-breaking machine.

But Bletchley tour parties are no longer brought into the Museum and must pay a separate fee to visit it.

The museum used to have a good relationship with the Bletchley Park Trust, but this has foundered since CEO Iain Standen took the helm of the heritage site.

Sawyers added: "The only mention of the National Museum of Computing on the Bletchley website is buried here. What it does not mention is that you cannot visit the site just to see Colossus - you have to pay the site entry fee at the gate and then as a result of Byzantine politics pay extra to see everything to do with Colossus."

The National Museum of Computing claimed that the Trust were building a fence to make sure the two institutions are kept entirely apart.

"We owe it to the men and women who worked at Bletchley Park during the war and to those who have helped save Bletchley Park since the 1990s to play our part in telling the full code-breaking story," a spokesman said.

"Unfortunately, Bletchley Park Trust have told us that they will not negotiate until recently agreed debts are paid, even though a timetable for payment has already been agreed.

"The Bletchley Park site as a whole is a major tool to help educate young people. We should together be celebrating this history and the development of the British computing industry rather than erecting fences and splitting a heritage site."

We have written to Sawyers to confirm he wrote the post, but he has not yet replied.

The Bletchley Park Trust issued a long statement rebuffing many of the claims in Sawyers' post.

"The Lorenz machine has, from the outset of its arrival at Bletchley Park, been on loan to the Bletchley Park Trust by GCHQ, one of a number of artefacts and documents GCHQ has loaned to the Bletchley Park Trust, dating back to the 1990s," a spokeswoman said.

"It is now on permanent public display, in a secure case pertinent to its historic value, in an exhibition in the Block B museum that tells the remarkable story of the breaking of Lorenz by the Bletchley Park Codebreakers. All this [is] a wonderful marker of how far the Bletchley Park Trust has progressed in ten years."

It also denied it was neglecting the upkeep of the German cipher machine:

The Bletchley Park Trust now employs a Curator; the custodian of the Trust’s collection, responsible for its protection, preservation and conservation, in line with the standards you would expect for its value to the nation.

TNMOC is supposed to pay £100,000 to the Trust for its "Block H" building, where the Colossus and Tunny are located. It does not receive any government funding.

A number of readers have contacted us to share their thoughts about this story. If you know something about the Battle of Bletchley, please do contact us – click the author's name at the top to send an email or get stuck into the comments below. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests
Day 4: 'News'-papers STILL rammed with Clooney nuptials
iPAD-FONDLING fanboi sparks SECURITY ALERT at Sydney airport
Breaches screening rules cos Apple SCREEN ROOLZ, ok?
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
A moment of brilliance? UPnP for Internet of Stuff lightbulbs
Thus doth tech of future illuminate present, etc
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.