Feeds

Tech giants CAN disclose US spooks' data demands - but with heavy restrictions

Related: Apple received just 250 data requests in 2013

SANS - Survey on application security programs

Apple has announced that it received less than 250 requests for data from US intelligence agencies in the first half of last year after the Obama administration slightly loosened restrictions on disclosing spooks' data requests.

After months of negotiations between the Obama administration and tech firms, from Yahoo! to Facebook, the Department of Justice filed with the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to allow "more detailed disclosures" about the amount of data the government tries to get out of web companies and communications providers.

The change of heart follows a speech earlier this month by President Obama, when he said he would take steps to reform America's intelligence operations. These would include more declassification of future opinions of the surveillance court that have "broad privacy implications".

The new rules allow tech firms to report numbers of national disclosure orders they get listed by the thousand, but with no specifics about the type of data that's requested – and potential delays in disclosure of up to six months.

Agencies also get elbow room on any requests they make to new platforms or services that haven't already been outed as subject to intelligence orders, getting a two-year delay to hide the fact that they're pursuing new avenues of information.

Although companies are able to disclose more information about intelligence orders, they're still restricted by a number of rules - hence the vague report from Apple. The DoJ allows communications providers to report the number of "national security letters" (NSL) - administrative subpoenas typically used by FBI agents to demand data related to national security - received or the number of customer accounts affected by NSLs in the thousands.

Companies are also allowed to report the number of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) requests for content they get in the thousands, the number of customer "selectors" - meaning identifiable information like email addresses or usernames - in the thousands and FISA orders for "non-content" like metadata, again restricted to the thousands.

But if companies want to narrow the numbers down under a thousand, they have to conflate NSLs and FISA orders into a single number reported in bands of 250 or affected customer selectors in the same bands. Firms are only allowed to report every six months, subject to the six-month or potential two-year delays.

Apple went for the second option in reporting its figures for the six months up to the end of June last year, when it said it got under 250 intelligence orders in total. The company also said that it received 927 law enforcement account requests for information on 2,330 accounts and that data was disclosed on 747 accounts and non-content data was revealed for 601 of the requests.

"The number of accounts involved in national security orders is infinitesimal relative to the hundreds of millions of accounts registered with Apple," the firm said. ®

Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction

More from The Register

next story
Parent gabfest Mumsnet hit by SSL bug: My heart bleeds, grins hacker
Natter-board tells middle-class Britain to purée its passwords
Samsung Galaxy S5 fingerprint scanner hacked in just 4 DAYS
Sammy's newbie cooked slower than iPhone, also costs more to build
Obama allows NSA to exploit 0-days: report
If the spooks say they need it, they get it
Web data BLEEDOUT: Users to feel the pain as Heartbleed bug revealed
Vendors and ISPs have work to do updating firmware - if it's possible to fix this
Snowden-inspired crypto-email service Lavaboom launches
German service pays tribute to Lavabit
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Call of Duty 'fragged using OpenSSL's Heartbleed exploit'
So it begins ... or maybe not, says one analyst
NSA denies it knew about and USED Heartbleed encryption flaw for TWO YEARS
Agency forgets it exists to protect communications, not just spy on them
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.