Feeds

GP surgeries MUST DO BETTER on data handling, says ICO

Watchdog warning comes as NHS prepares to unlock medical records

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

A number of GP surgeries in England allowed their employees to have unrestricted internet access - thereby increasing the risk of data being leaked, hacked and targeted by viruses, Britain's information watchdog warned today.

Officials from the Information Commissioner's Office visited 24 GP practices between April and November 2013 to inspect how well those NHS doctors' surgeries were handling sensitive patient data.

It found (PDF) that several of the sites agreed that staff could access personal email accounts via the surgery's computer system, and added that local polices on acceptable internet and email usage were "not always reflected in the software/tools that enforced them".

The ICO said:

The visits helped to highlight the pressures faced by GPs as data controllers for their patient records in a time of massive change to the structure and practices within the NHS and the corresponding information flows.

NHS England is currently posting leaflets out in among junk mail to 26.5m households highlighting that patients have a right to opt out of its plans to share their medical records, even though it failed to provide a simple form that individuals could then submit to their GPs.

Under the so-called care.data scheme, the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) will shortly begin laboriously collecting patient info from GP practices, which will then be linked with hospital data it already stores.

However, controversially, GP surgeries are ultimately saddled with any issues that arise while the records are being transferred to the HSCIC.

But the ICO found shortcomings during its visits to the GP practices.

It said improvements could be made when it comes to reporting data breaches and of informing patients about how their information will be shared with the NHS, private companies and "approved" researchers.

The regulator warned that more needed to be done with the "risks posed by unrestricted internet access."

Paper records containing sensitive medical information took up considerable space, the ICO noted. It said the volumes of paperwork needed to be carefully managed.

“The NHS processes some of the most sensitive personal information available and data breaches at GP surgeries can have significant repercussions for the individuals affected," said the ICO's Lee Taylor.

"But we were broadly pleased with what we saw during the advisory visits. Having the right policies and procedures in place is the backbone to good data protection and the GP practices we visited tended to have these."

On Monday, the regulator explained in a blog post how the UK's Data Protection Act applied to the care.data scheme.

The ICO's Dawn Monaghan said:

GPs holding personal information about patients is nothing new and is covered squarely by the DPA. Generally everyone understands what’s happening: you give personal information to your GP who then records that information as your medical history. This record may include information from other health services and allows your GP to track your health throughout your lifetime.

The changes begin with some of the personal information included in that record going from GPs to the HSCIC. This happens under the direction of NHS England, which is allowed due to a new law, the Health and Social Care Act 2012.

This law gives NHS England the right to direct the HSCIC to collect certain sorts of data from the medical records. The law is a statutory enactment which requires the disclosure of the data, which means the data becomes exempt from the main parts of the DPA.

In other words, there is no legal opt out under the UK's data protection law, which in turn means that care.data is not regulated by the ICO - nor does the watchdog set the rules on how the system works.

"That responsibility for letting patients know what is happening falls to GPs, as the data controllers," said Monaghan.

"It might seem unfair that this responsibility doesn’t fall on NHS England, who are instructing the data collection, or on the HSCIC who will collect and use it, but the DPA focuses squarely on the whoever originally collected, holds and is going to disclose the data (the data controller) - in this case the GPs."

She added that the ICO had initially concluded that NHS England - with its much-criticised leaflet drop that was addressed to households rather than individuals - had met the fair processing requirements under the DPA.

Beyond that, patients objecting to the medical records data grab are expected to burden GPs with their concerns.

NHS patients and information director Tim Kelsey attempted to shrug off critics who are worried about who might have access to the data-sharing system earlier this week.

He said on his Twitter account: "care.data only for NHS patient care purposes; no insurance or other applications permitted. NHS guarantees privacy."

The HSCIC will start receiving the data from GP surgeries in England in the next few months. Once collected, the ICO will be able to police how that information is shared because at that point the HSCIC will be the data controller.

It will be interesting to see at that stage if Kelsey's promises hold tight. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.