Feeds

Judge sighs at 'whack-a-mole' lawsuits as Apple deals blow to Samsung

Eternal patent war latest: San Jose beak's patience is wearing thin

SANS - Survey on application security programs

Apple has won an early judgment in a California court squabble over alleged patent infringement by rival Samsung.

Judge Lucy Koh has issued [PDF] a trio of summary judgments that uphold one Apple claim, deny a second, and strike down a motion by Samsung ahead of the companies' formal trial over handheld gadget technology this spring.

The case, like so many others between Apple and various Android handset makers, centers on claims that devices powered by Google's operating system use a number of technologies Apple has patented for use with its own iOS family of devices.

The Cupertino giant's latest round of claims surround patents the company holds around the use of word recommendations (US 8,074,172) when typing text on a mobile device, a claim that was upheld by Judge Koh in a summary judgment.

Additionally, Apple won summary judgment of a claim to invalidate infringement claims on patents surrounding data synching (US 7,761,414) on mobile devices.

Several other Apple claims for summary judgments in its favor were shot down by Judge Koh, as were Samsung's various claims for summary judgments.

In issuing her decision, Judge Koh also noted that lawyers from both sides have shown a propensity for monkey businesses which is wearing thin on the court.

"The court has learned through two prior trials with these parties, both in Case No. 11-CV-1846, that, given the chance, each side will continue to generate creative linguistic arguments about nearly every term in a claim in order to accuse the other side of 'ignoring the court's claim construction rulings' or 'adding limitations to the plain language of the claim'," she wrote.

"Resolving those disputes has taken on a 'whack-a-mole' character, one for which the returns have quickly diminished."

The two firms remain locked in an ongoing war of attrition over claims that each side violated the other's patents relating to the development and operation of mobile devices, including handsets and tablets. Each has asked judges in various parts of the world to block import or sale of the alleged infringing devices.

Apple has thus far claimed the closest thing to a win in the case, being awarded a $1bn decision by the courts in a 2012 decision which was later reduced after several more rounds of legal wrangling.

The two firms are set to take the remainder of this latest case to a trial which is slated to kick off in March, barring a last-minute agreement between the companies when CEOs Tim Cook and Oh-Hyun Kwon meet for a mediation session next month. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Lavabit loses contempt of court appeal over protecting Snowden, customers
Judges rule complaints about government power are too little, too late
Whoever you vote for, Google gets in
Report uncovers giant octopus squid of lobbying influence
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.