Feeds

And the winner of the most reliable disk drive award is ...

Backup outfit Backblaze releases longevity data for its 27,000 disks

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The folks at backup-as-a-service outfit Backblaze have again done something astounding: they've not only looked at log files but analysed them, this time to figure out which vendor's disk drives offer the longest working life.

There's a scary-looking histogram in BackBlaze's post detailing the results that shows Seagate drives failing more often, but a glance at the table below suggests Backblaze has been running some of Seagate's kit for rather longer than it has used other drives.

Model Size Number of Drives Average Age in Years Annual Failure Rate
Seagate Desktop (ST4000DM000) HDD.15 4.0TB 5199 0.3 3.80%
Hitachi GST Deskstar 7K2000 (HDS722020ALA330) 2.0TB 4716 2.9 1.10%
Hitachi GST Deskstar 5K3000 (HDS5C3030ALA630) 3.0TB 4592 1.7 0.90%
Seagate Barracuda (ST3000DM001) 3.0TB 4252 1.4 9.80%
Hitachi Deskstar 5K4000 (HDS5C4040ALE630) 4.0TB 2587 0.8 1.50%
Seagate Barracuda LP (ST31500541AS) 1.5TB 1929 3.8 9.90%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 (HDS723030ALA640) 3.0TB 1027 2.1 0.90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200(ST31500341AS) 1.5TB 539 3.8 25.40%
Western Digital Green (WD10EADS) 1.0TB 474 4.4 3.60%
Western Digital Red (WD30EFRX) 3.0TB 346 0.5 3.20%
Seagate Barracuda XT (ST33000651AS) 3.0TB 293 2 7.30%
Seagate Barracuda LP (ST32000542AS) 2.0TB 288 2 7.20%
Seagate Barracuda XT (ST4000DX000) 4.0TB 179 0.7 n/a
Western Digital Green (WD10EACS) 1.0TB 84 5 n/a
Seagate Barracuda Green (ST1500DL003) 1.5TB 51 0.8 120.00%

The big winner from the study is Hitachi GST, whose drives consistently outlast others Backblaze uses and are also less likely to fall into a degraded state. Perhaps there's upside for the outfit's new owner Western Digital too: WD's own kit did worse in this study so some technology transfer could benefit the company's future drives.

The results make no claims for the performance of drives approved for use in enterprise arrays: Backblaze cheerfully RAIDs up consumer-grade and desktop drives to power its service. The analysis is therefore of limited use to those running enterprise storage appliances.

Those looking to populate a small array, or PC builders, may find the analysis represents useful guidance. ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Stop the IoT revolution! We need to figure out packet sizes first
Researchers test 802.15.4 and find we know nuh-think! about large scale sensor network ops
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.