Feeds

Sniff, sniff, what's that burning smell? Oh, it's Google's patent-filing office working flat out

Nearly 2,000 patents granted to the ad giant in 2013

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Google, perhaps as sick as we are of the ongoing patent wars, spent last year furiously filling its technology war chest – with new designs rubber-stamped by the US patent office, according to research published by The Financial Times.

The study, syndicated by The Australian Financial Review here, was created by patent tracker IFI. It claims Google was in 21st place in 2012 in terms of patents issued in the US, and didn't even make the top 50 in 2011.

But then in 2013, the IFI says, Google banked 1,920 patents, enough to place it in the US top 10 when compared to the 2012 list, here. The Chocolate Factory would still have to double its output to get close to top-of-the-table patent recipients IBM (6,478 in 2012) and Samsung (5,081).

Forgive us for suggesting that Google hopes to emerge victorious from the smartphone patent omnishambles by defensively protecting its technology, and at a rate not seen before from the company.

And that's probably because the greater Android's success, the more reason Apple and Microsoft have to continue their lawsuits. Indeed, scanning even the first 50 search results at the US Patent Office shows reasonable activity in the mobile space.

That fifty also includes what look to the untrained eye like “troll” filings: e-commerce enabled advertising, email conversation management, advertising with audio content and so on. To be fair, however, there are also "core business" patents there, covering search and cloud computing operations.

The FT notes that as well as bolstering its “weak” position in the smartphone patent market, Google's awarded patents also reflect its enthusiasm for the wearable business.

Google's chief patent lawyer Allen Lo also nominated robotics patents as a priority in discussion with the FT, saying the company had learned from the smartphone litigation and wanted to “avoid a war” in its new markets. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.