Feeds

Australia rebukes Apple for 'false or misleading representations'

Cupertino's Oz outpost falls foul of local warranty laws

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Australia's Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has slapped Apple and extracted an “enforceable undertaking” from the company that will result in fines – or worse – if the company continues to ignore its own warranty and return polices.

At issue are Apple's 12 month warranty and 14 day return policies, which weren't being applied consistently or were applied in ways that breach the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), the antipodean code describing how business has to deal with its customers. That code offers two-year warranties.

The ACCC, Australia's consumer watchdog, loves nothing more than catching a big brand cruelling punters. The Commission's chairman Rod Sims thundered that his outfit “was concerned that Apple was applying its own warranties and refund policies effectively to the exclusion of the consumer guarantees contained in the Australian Consumer Law.”

The ACCC's emission on the matter goes further, saying “The ACCC was concerned that Apple had made a number of false or misleading representations to a number of consumers regarding their consumer guarantee rights, including that Apple was not required to provide a refund, replacement or repair to consumers in circumstances where these remedies were required by the consumer guarantees in the ACL.”

Apple's 'fessed up and “acknowledged the ACCC's concerns, and that some of these representations to consumers may have contravened the ACL.”

The ACCC's remedy is an “enforceable undertaking” that sees Apple promise to fix things up for dudded customers, fix kit that breaks in the first two years of its life, train its staff so they get it right in future, erect a web page explaining its policies and hand out the ACCC's brochure explaining warranty rules in its shops. And yes, that sob you heard was Jony Ive's shock at having to besmirch his beautiful stores with a government brochure.

If Apple's found to breach the undertaking, a court can enforce the provisions mentioned above. It Cupertino keeps getting it wrong, the big stick comes out and fines are in prospect. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Snowden, Dotcom, throw bombs into NZ election campaign
Claim of tapped undersea cable refuted by Kiwi PM as Kim claims extradition plot
Heavy VPN users are probably pirates, says BBC
And ISPs should nab 'em on our behalf
Former Bitcoin Foundation chair pleads guilty to money-laundering charge
Charlie Shrem plea deal could still get him five YEARS in chokey
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.