Feeds

Dimmed but not out: Lantern anti-censorship tool blocked in China

Team behind P2P service working on a more resistant version

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

China’s formidable censorship apparatus has finally caught up with a Washington-backed tool designed to help users bypass the Great Firewall, but its creators have vowed to bounce back.

Lantern works like a P2P network, allowing users with access to the free internet to share their connections with those whose access is restricted.

Just last week The Reg reported that the service, which was apparently given seed funding by the US State Department, had seen a huge spike in global users from the low hundreds to 10,000 – driven by demand from China.

However, its sudden popularity inside the Great Firewall also attracted the attention of China’s web police.

On their Tumblr site, the Lantern team wrote a brief post explaining that the project’s fallback servers had been blocked in China – something they claim to have predicted:

The way we have allowed users to request invites meant that anyone could sign up, including the censors. If you happened to sign up at the same time as a censor, you would be sharing the same fallback proxy, which the censor would end up blocking. This means that all other users who signed up at that same time would also get blocked.

However, that’s not the end of the road for Lantern in China, with the team claiming to be working on a new version “more resistant” to blocking, which will require greater restrictions on invites to use the service.

They added:

In the future, to get access you’ll need to get invited by an existing Lantern user with access - a user with a fully working version of Lantern. We now need to focus on growing the trust network organically to stay unblocked. You can help by adding only your trusted contacts in censored and uncensored regions. This is how we will gradually grow a stronger network.

Even Beijing’s latest efforts to block the service inside the Great Firewall haven’t been completely successful.

Lantern now boasts around 17,000 users globally with three-quarters coming from China, according to the South China Morning Post.

Perhaps more tellingly, these users apparently account for 94 per cent (6.4TB) of the total traffic on the service. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
Hungary's internet tax cannot be allowed to set a precedent, says EC
More protests planned against giga-tariff for Tuesday evening
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.