Feeds

NO XMAS PRESENTS FOR Google Now and Siri: Chirpy scamps get a C+

Analyst's test shows Cupertino dumping Google's results, both must try HARDER

High performance access to file storage

A series of tests on the effectiveness of iOS and Android's voice-controlled search apps shows that Google Now is catching up on Apple's Siri software, but still has some way to go in beating its Cupertinian competitor.

Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster asked the two personal-assistant programs 800 questions apiece – half spoken outdoors and half indoors – about nearby things, shopping and other commerce, directions to places, and general information, and also tried to run the operating system by voice.

In both environments both Google Now and Siri understood the question correctly 94 per cent of the time; Google answered with 81 per cent accuracy, compared to Siri's 83 per cent. Overall, Munster gave both utilities a C+.

Unsurprisingly Google Now was strongest on navigation questions, but also did well on pulling up local services and information. Siri scored very well for allowing fuller voice control of the operating system, with Google Now not understanding how to stop and pause music, for example.

"We believe that our test suggests that Google Now and Siri are comparable in terms of understanding the spoken queries and returning the correct result," wrote Munster in a research note to investors.

This is the third time Munster has carried out the testing and he noted that whereas Apple's results have improved by two percentage points in the last year, Google Now has come on 9 per cent, with the Chocolate Factory's engine seeing its biggest improvement in its ability to take voice commands in noisier environments.

One major change over the last series of tests is Apple dramatically reducing Siri's reliance on search results from its rival Google. Last year Siri used Google's data 27 per cent of the time, but in the latest testing round this had dropped to just 3 per cent. To compensate Siri now makes greater use of Bing, Wolfram Alpha, and Wikipedia. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Windows 8.1, which you probably haven't upgraded to yet, ALREADY OBSOLETE
Pre-Update versions of new Windows version will no longer support patches
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
OpenSSL Heartbleed: Bloody nose for open-source bleeding hearts
Bloke behind the cockup says not enough people are helping crucial crypto project
Microsoft lobs pre-release Windows Phone 8.1 at devs who dare
App makers can load it before anyone else, but if they do they're stuck with it
Half of Twitter's 'active users' are SILENT STALKERS
Nearly 50% have NEVER tweeted a word
Windows XP still has 27 per cent market share on its deathbed
Windows 7 making some gains on XP Death Day
Internet-of-stuff startup dumps NoSQL for ... SQL?
NoSQL taste great at first but lacks proper nutrients, says startup cloud whiz
US taxman blows Win XP deadline, must now spend millions on custom support
Gov't IT likened to 'a Model T with a lot of things on top of it'
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.