Feeds

US Supreme Court says 'no sale' to Amazon's New York sales tax appeal

Online sellers must collect tax like brick and mortar retailers

High performance access to file storage

The US Supreme Court has declined to intervene in a long-running spat between Amazon and the State of New York over collection of sales tax for online purchases, Bloomberg reports.

The decision means the web retail giant has exhausted its legal options, and the law requiring it to add sales tax to purchases by customers in the Empire State will stand.

The New York State statute was signed into law in early 2008 by then-governor David Paterson, having first been proposed by Paterson's predecessor, Eliot Spitzer, a former state attorney general.

Amazon wasted no time challenging the law in state court, claiming that it violated key clauses of the US Constitution governing interstate commerce.

The e-tailer argued that the Supreme Court has previously held that businesses are only required to collect sales taxes for states in which they have a physical presence – and Amazon has no offices or warehouses in New York State.

But Paterson and the law's supporters countered that countless independent resellers are operating in New York while using Amazon's website and affiliate program to advertise and sell their wares. Because Amazon receives a cut of those sales, they argued, it in effect has a presence in the state.

A New York Supreme Court judge agreed with the state's position in 2009, and Amazon has been pursuing appeals ever since, eventually taking the matter all the way to the highest court in the land.

But the US Supreme Court justices alone decide whether they will hear any specific case, and by rejecting Amazon's petition without comment, they leave Jeff Bezos & Co. with no further venues in which to appeal the earlier decision.

The Supremes' refusal to hear Amazon's case also puts the kibosh on a separate suit brought by e-tailer Overstock.com, which went as far as to cut ties with approximately 3,400 New York–based affiliates in a fruitless attempt to "send a message" to New York State lawmakers.

Amazon hasn't gone that far yet. In fact, it decided to grin and bear a similar law that went into effect in California in 2012, and it now collects taxes in a total of 16 states.

But what Amazon really wants is a simpler tax structure that would allow it to collect sales tax at a single rate for each state. To that end, it has backed the so-called Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), which would establish a new tax regime specifically for online businesses.

Under the current system, individual cities and municipalities are each allowed to add their own taxes to purchases by local residents, meaning large retailers like Amazon must potentially collect taxes for thousands of separate jurisdictions. The MFA – which has already passed the Senate but has yet to clear Congress' lower house – would force states to streamline their tax laws to accommodate online sellers.

In the meantime, Amazon has not said what action it will take in the wake of its snubbing by the Supreme Court, but it seems likely it will continue to do business in New York, the nation's third most populous state.

At the time Governor Paterson approved the law, it was estimated that taxes collected by Amazon and others would provide New York with an additional $50m in annual revenues. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Big Content goes after Kim Dotcom
Six studios sling sueballs at dead download destination
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.