Feeds

Confessions of a porn site boss: How the net porn industry flopped

Part 2: How Gonzo porn led to jail for some unlucky producers

The Power of One Brief: Top reasons to choose HP BladeSystem

NSFW It was the year 2000, and porn on VHS cassettes was so last decade. Now anyone could get any type of porn without the embarrassment of having to go into a seedy sex shop, thanks to the internet.

I had realised there was cash to be made on the web. It was good money for little work, especially if you weren't too bothered by how ethically you made the sales.

The good times couldn't last, however. At the start of the new millennium, with the advent of high speed multi megabit internet connectivity you could download the latest DVDs ripped down to Video CDs. Entire sites would be downloadable in one go. Why pay for what you can get for free?

Then Bit Torrent happened. It made piracy as easy as a couple of clicks. People could download whatever took their fancy at super high speeds. Even my cat could do Bit Torrent. It brought easy porn piracy to the masses.

Conversion ratios went through the floor. Less conversions, less money. Good sites went from 1:150 to over 1:1500 to get a single sign up. There was less cash flowing for everyone.

Some affiliate programs started offering financial incentives that were - to put it bluntly - unsustainable. The average surfer stays a site member for between one to three months. Anything over that is a bonus. Some sites were offering $80 - $100 for signups. That left little to nothing for the site owner.

To make things worse, a flood of people saw that internet porn was a licence to print money. They took the advertising content offered on the sites and gave it all away in one go. There was a feeling that the more free content you put on there, the more likely you were to get a conversion. While it worked in the short term, in the long term this was disastrous because keeping the surfer horny but needy until that credit card number was entered was the absolute key to making money. Give too much away and a sale was lost, for obvious reasons.

The balancing act became even more precarious when porntubes came online. Not to be outdone by YouTube and its massive traffic generating possibilities, the porn guys and gals jumped all over it. There was more content and more competition for the same surfers but all with more powerful video. TGPs became video galleries and images no longer cut it; people expected hi-def porn all the way. This meant more bandwidth and, more work. At least bandwidth was getting cheaper.

You want hardcore? You can't handle hardcore!

The more you get used to something, the more you need to get the same effect. So while the whole web was awash with lots of cheap women in sexy poses, the way forward was to offer more hardcore material.

As the internet porn world exploded, some people believed in the mantra "The more hardcore, the more cash". The type of porn moved on from titillation and conventional sex through to hard core and through to Gonzo porn. Gonzo*, a genre in itself outside of pornography, is amongst some of the most female-degrading porn around. (“If you like something a bit more interesting, try German Goo Girls!”)

Things got harder and not in a good way. Having tolerated this for so long, the US government reached the point of "enough is enough" and stepped in. Prosecutions and scare tactics were the order of the day.

The COPA law of 2003, also known in the industry as "section 2257", was the tool the US government used.

This law caused shockwaves throughout the adult industry from the moment it was devised. In essence, the law stated that anybody who used or "touched" the content was essentially classed as having contributed to the production. It also required detailed records to be kept by the producer of the content for inspection at any time by the government including proof of age and similar information. This is why most porn sites have a "2257 Notice". It may be in small print, but it will be there.

This law also meant that most of the content that existed up to that point was unusable because no 2257 documentation existed. Technically it didn't matter outside the US, but it was not worth the risk of a US person seeing it and a prosecution coming your way. People predicted mass site closures and the loss of lots of producers.

In the end, not much changed, except that the old content had to be discarded. Some studios fell by the wayside but for the most part it was business as usual. As a side note some adult amateur porn-sharing sites had to ban all but the most mundane porn for fear of falling foul of the rules.

Life continued as 2005 rolled around. Then the prosecutions happened. Amongst the first people to be prosecuted by the government was Paul Little, AKA "Max Hardcore". Max was an internet legend amongst those who liked the more extreme hardcore side of porn: hard anal sex, anal and vaginal fisting, girls dressed like schoolgirls, usually finished off with a full on facial.

Degradation was the main theme and that was turned to the max, no pun intended.

It was the schoolgirl part that got Max into hot water. During one of the scenes a girl claimed to be 12 years old - in keeping with the script - although obviously she wasn't. The government tried to prosecute him for portraying an underage character but ultimately the charges were dismissed after the defendant in a similar case was found not guilty. A jury failed to reach a verdict on a lesser, simultaneous, charge of distributing obscenity.

Securing Web Applications Made Simple and Scalable

More from The Register

next story
Apple fanbois SCREAM as update BRICKS their Macbook Airs
Ragegasm spills over as firmware upgrade kills machines
HIDDEN packet sniffer spy tech in MILLIONS of iPhones, iPads – expert
Don't panic though – Apple's backdoor is not wide open to all, guru tells us
Mozilla fixes CRITICAL security holes in Firefox, urges v31 upgrade
Misc memory hazards 'could be exploited' - and guess what, one's a Javascript vuln
NO MORE ALL CAPS and other pleasures of Visual Studio 14
Unpicking a packed preview that breaks down ASP.NET
Captain Kirk sets phaser to SLAUGHTER after trying new Facebook app
William Shatner less-than-impressed by Zuck's celebrity-only app
Cheer up, Nokia fans. It can start making mobes again in 18 months
The real winner of the Nokia sale is *drumroll* ... Nokia
EU dons gloves, pokes Google's deals with Android mobe makers
El Reg cops a squint at investigatory letters
Chrome browser has been DRAINING PC batteries for YEARS
Google is only now fixing ancient, energy-sapping bug
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Reducing security risks from open source software
Follow a few strategies and your organization can gain the full benefits of open source and the cloud without compromising the security of your applications.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Consolidation: the foundation for IT and business transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.