Feeds

Apple dodges data privacy sueball: Fanbois didn't RTFM*, says judge

They never bothered to read the privacy policy... so they have no case

SANS - Survey on application security programs

A US judge has thrown out an Apple user lawsuit over data privacy, saying that the former fanbois and gurlz had failed to show any evidence that they knew about Apple's privacy policies before they bought their iPhones.

Four iDevice users claimed in 2011 that Apple had violated its privacy policy by allowing third-party app developers to have access to personal information and by transmitting local Wi-Fi and phone tower data when Location Services were turned off.

They claimed they had been "harmed" by this behaviour as they would never have paid so much for their iPhones if they'd known Apple was going to do that and said that their mobiles had lost storage space and battery life from the transmission of their data.

Two of the mobe-owners said they didn't realise that third-party apps could collect their personal information and alleged that Apple had designed the iOS environment to easily transmit their data to companies that collect and analyse it without consent, despite a privacy policy that claimed to protect users. The other two plaintiffs said that their phones were sending location information even when they'd turned that feature off. Before the 4.3.3 version of iOS, iPhones were still sending Wi-Fi hotspot and mobile tower data due to a "software bug", according to Apple.

Although Judge Lucy Koh acknowledged that there may have been harm done, she said the plaintiffs had failed to show that they'd read, seen or heard anything about the company's data policies before they bought their iPhones.

In order for the case to stand up under law, the complainants would have to show that Apple's misrepresentations in its policies had directly influenced their decision to buy a fruity mobe and none of them could.

"To survive a standing challenge at summary judgment, plaintiffs must be able to provide some evidence that they saw one or more of Apple’s alleged misrepresentations, that they actually relied on those misrepresentations, and that they were harmed thereby," she said in her ruling.

"In a case founded on the premise that Apple’s misrepresentations caused plaintiffs substantial harm, this evidentiary burden is far from unreasonable, yet plaintiffs have failed to meet it." ®

* Read The F*cking (privacy) Manual ...

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Lavabit loses contempt of court appeal over protecting Snowden, customers
Judges rule complaints about government power are too little, too late
Whoever you vote for, Google gets in
Report uncovers giant octopus squid of lobbying influence
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.