Feeds

Indy devs to AOL: Save Winamp, or at least make it open source

Petition aims to stay Nullsoft executioner's axe

Build a business case: developing custom apps

A petition to save the doomed media player Winamp has already garnered more than 15,000 signatures, but the software's parent company has yet to show any signs of reversing its decision.

Nullsoft, the AOL subsidiary that has developed Winamp for the last 15 years, announced last week that the software will reach the end of its life on December 20. Not only will the media player itself no longer be available for download, but even its website is due to disappear.

Now a Change.org petition started by Melbourne, Australia–based web developer Peter Zawacki asks AOL to continue development of Winamp – or failing that, to give it a new lease on life by releasing the code as an open-source project.

"Winamp is the best media player ever built," Zawacki's petition site states. "If there were other alternatives that would be fine. But there is nothing that can do what Winamp can do. It is the most versatile media player on Earth."

An accompanying website goes as far as to invite developers who would like to work on the Winamp source code to get in touch, and many of the supporters of the effort whose names are listed on the site identify themselves as programmers.

Save Winamp Change.org petition art

Peter Zawacki is hoping that amassing enough signatures will convince AOL to open source Winamp

"If AOL allows it to go open source it WILL live on forever and be in the hands of people who love it and use it every day," the petition reads. "AOL, keep Winamp alive or let it go open source."

Unfortunately for Winamp fans, so far AOL has had little to say on the subject. It hasn't issued a press release or even a blog post so far. The world first learned of Winamp's impending demise from a brief notice posted on the software's official website that gave nothing by way of explanation, saying only that the property would vanish in December.

El Reg has tried to contact both Nullsoft and its parent, AOL, but neither company has responded to our queries so far.

Whether it will respond when Zawacki delivers his petition remains to be seen. Zawacki is seeking 25,000 signatures and he has just 25 days left before Nullsoft pulls the plug on Winamp. ®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
Why has the web gone to hell? Market chaos and HUMAN NATURE
Tim Berners-Lee isn't happy, but we should be
Microsoft boots 1,500 dodgy apps from the Windows Store
DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! DEVELOPERS! Naughty, misleading developers!
'Stop dissing Google or quit': OK, I quit, says Code Club co-founder
And now a message from our sponsors: 'STFU or else'
Apple promises to lift Curse of the Drained iPhone 5 Battery
Have you tried turning it off and...? Never mind, here's a replacement
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Linux turns 23 and Linus Torvalds celebrates as only he can
No, not with swearing, but by controlling the release cycle
Scratched PC-dispatch patch patched, hatched in batch rematch
Windows security update fixed after triggering blue screens (and screams) of death
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.