Feeds

Indy devs to AOL: Save Winamp, or at least make it open source

Petition aims to stay Nullsoft executioner's axe

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

A petition to save the doomed media player Winamp has already garnered more than 15,000 signatures, but the software's parent company has yet to show any signs of reversing its decision.

Nullsoft, the AOL subsidiary that has developed Winamp for the last 15 years, announced last week that the software will reach the end of its life on December 20. Not only will the media player itself no longer be available for download, but even its website is due to disappear.

Now a Change.org petition started by Melbourne, Australia–based web developer Peter Zawacki asks AOL to continue development of Winamp – or failing that, to give it a new lease on life by releasing the code as an open-source project.

"Winamp is the best media player ever built," Zawacki's petition site states. "If there were other alternatives that would be fine. But there is nothing that can do what Winamp can do. It is the most versatile media player on Earth."

An accompanying website goes as far as to invite developers who would like to work on the Winamp source code to get in touch, and many of the supporters of the effort whose names are listed on the site identify themselves as programmers.

Save Winamp Change.org petition art

Peter Zawacki is hoping that amassing enough signatures will convince AOL to open source Winamp

"If AOL allows it to go open source it WILL live on forever and be in the hands of people who love it and use it every day," the petition reads. "AOL, keep Winamp alive or let it go open source."

Unfortunately for Winamp fans, so far AOL has had little to say on the subject. It hasn't issued a press release or even a blog post so far. The world first learned of Winamp's impending demise from a brief notice posted on the software's official website that gave nothing by way of explanation, saying only that the property would vanish in December.

El Reg has tried to contact both Nullsoft and its parent, AOL, but neither company has responded to our queries so far.

Whether it will respond when Zawacki delivers his petition remains to be seen. Zawacki is seeking 25,000 signatures and he has just 25 days left before Nullsoft pulls the plug on Winamp. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Sign off my IT project or I’ll PHONE your MUM
Honestly, it’s a piece of piss
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
Torvalds CONFESSES: 'I'm pretty good at alienating devs'
Admits to 'a metric ****load' of mistakes during work with Linux collaborators
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.