Feeds

Nokia emerges smothered in red ink, manages to flog cheapo Windows Phones

A little more kerr-ching than last time

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Nokia bagged record sales of Windows Phones sales in the third quarter of 2013, thanks largely to its low-end models: 8.8m Lumia handsets were shifted, up from 7.7m in Q2.

The mobile-phone division, for which Nokia has accepted a bid of €5.44bn in cash from Microsoft (pending approval at a shareholders' meeting), recorded revenue of €2.89bn, down 19 per cent year on year, and a small loss of €86m, or €47m non-IFRS.

Revenue from "smart devices" rose to €1.25bn, up from €976m this time a year ago. However, this includes sales of 5.9 million Asha full-touchscreen "smartphones", which run a tarted-up Series 40 OS. Symbian sales were 3.5m a year ago, but "approximately zero" in Q3 2013. And mobile phone sales are significantly down from a year ago, although 55.8m units sold represents an increase from the previous quarter.

To put that into perspective, Apple's "flop" iPhone 5C phone, which borrows its design aesthetic from Nokia's distinctive Lumias, is expected to ship between 10m and 11m units in its first full quarter on sale.

Nokia's average selling price (ASP) of €143 per smartphone device reflected the dominance of low-cost models. Nokia doesn't break out sales by model, but AdDuplex (which monitors a small sample of ad-supported apps on a given day) claimed 23.2 per cent of Windows Phone-generated traffic came from the Lumia 520 and a further 9.2 per cent from the Lumia 620 - the two cheapest Lumias.

Nokia said the low ASP to "was primarily due to lower recognition of deferred revenue related to services sold in combination with our devices and lower sales of accessories" along with currency fluctuations offset by a shift towards the more expensive 1020 and 925 Lumias.

As part of the Microsoft deal, Nokia stays in Finland, keeps the networking group, the HERE maps division, and the patents in an "advanced technologies" group. Microsoft acquires 32,000 employees whose work generated €14.9bn of revenue in 2012, almost half of Nokia's gross income.

The deal is expected to close in Q1 2014, Nokia confirmed today. So Nokia Siemens Solutions Networks becomes Nokia's primary cash cow. The NSN division saw revenue of €2.53bn in Q3. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.