Feeds

EU tsars rubbish Brit PM over attempt to delay beefed-up privacy rules

Privacy? Data protection? Sod 'em - there's an election coming, donchaknow

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Sources close to EU justice commissioner Viviane Reding have dismissed reports suggesting her proposed overhaul to the bloc's data protection laws has been stalled, after Britain's Prime Minister appeared to have postponed the regulation.

Late on Friday, the Financial Times reported that David Cameron had apparently convinced the European Council to block any swift adoption of the draft data protection rules.

But The Register has been told in confidence that such a claim "has nothing to do with reality."

We've asked Number 10 to clarify the Pink'Un's story, which cited an unnamed US tech exec who said that "Britain's common sense prevailed" at the summit – which itself was overshadowed by allegations that Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel had her phone tapped by US spooks.

At time of writing, Downing Street had not responded to The Register's request for comment.

Last week, MEPs voted in favour of ripping up existing data protection laws in Europe that were introduced in 1995, after the parliament's civil liberties committee made nearly 4,000 amendments to Reding's draft bill.

The lawmakers have been lobbying in recent months for tougher controls on privacy-invading tech in the wake of the NSA PRISM scandal.

But the FT, in an apparent reference to paragraph 8 of the European Council's conclusions from the summit, suggested that Cameron had successfully shoved any implementation of the proposed legislation back to 2015 - significantly after next year's parliamentary elections.

It states [PDF]:

The timely adoption of a strong EU General Data Protection framework and the Cyber-security Directive is essential for the completion of the Digital Single Market by 2015.

But sources close to Reding have dismissed Blighty's interpretation as not being grounded in reality.

A senior EU official told El Reg:

This event illustrates the fundamental institutional weakness of the European Council. It adopts its conclusions by consensus, which means that a single Member State (the UK) can prevent ambitious wording wanted by a majority. This can lead to consensus around the lowest common denominator.

The inclusion of the word 'timely' allows now all Heads of State and government to go home and interpret this in their way: the majority (Tusk, Hollande, Letta) can say: 'timely means now, before the European Parliament elections next May', while Cameron can say: 'not before 2015'.

This leaves things now in the hands of Parliament and Council. It will depend notably on the Council Presidencies whether they will have the political will to deliver what the Commission, the European Parliament and a clear majority at the European Council want.

If nothing else, Cameron certainly appears to have stirred things up. Readers in Blighty will know that Cameron's Conservative party have promised to hold a referendum on Britain's relationship with the EU after the general election of 2015, if they're elected with a majority.

Critics of Reding's attempts to fast-track her draft bill through European parliament, the council and the commission have long argued that such a plan was overly-ambitious. The EC's vice president only tabled the proposed regulations in January 2012, yet she is hoping to the whole thing wrapped up in 2014.

Reding said that EU leaders at the summit had "sent an important signal", despite Cameron's attempts to postpone the introduction of more stringent data laws that are expected to better address the digital age.

"Leaders committed to a timely adoption of a strong EU Data Protection framework," she said. "Whether this is ambitious enough to push 28 national ministers to agree with the European Parliament before the European elections in 2014, remains to be seen. It leaves the ball in the court of Ministers in the Council who have to match the ambition set by the European Parliament."

The commissioner added that it was unclear which nation states - some of whom, Reding said, were "less ambitious on content and timing" - will "lead the pack" on her planned reforms.

But ambiguity remains around exactly if and when Reding's data rules will be adopted. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.