Feeds

Boffins offer ROUTER DEATHLIST for software-defined network builders

You didn't think SDN would mean no upgrades, did you?

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Unless you've got fathomless pockets, a scary aspect of a software-defined networking implementation is the necessity for an infrastructure upgrade, since nobody wants to forklift every router in a big network all at once. Now, a paper co-authored by Nokia Siemens Networks' Marco Hoffmann proposes a set of algorithms to help plan the rollout.

The aim of the paper, published at Arxiv here, is to create a methodology that takes into account the current state of a network, balancing gains from traffic engineering with limitations on capital expenditure. Perhaps obviously, the authors say that “the sequence of migration plays a vital role, especially in the early stages of network migration to SDN”.

The group, which includes three authors from the Technical University at Braunschweig (Tamal Das, Marcel Caria and Admela Jukan), took on the system architect's perennial question: “if there's got to be an upgrade, which kit do I nuke first?”

As the paper puts it, in more academic terms: “operators need to understand how their network can make best use of traffic engineering capabilities enabled by SDN, during various stages of a migration process.”

Implementing SDN - difficult choices

Some of your routers get migrated first - but

which ones? Image source: arxiv.org/pdf/1310.0216v1.pdf

To try and answer this question, the researchers produced algorithms designed to assess two constraint cases: the network operator is limited either by the number of routers that can be migrated in a single step, or is limited by the available capex at any given moment (these cases look identical, but they aren't quite, since in the first case, the time it takes to drop in a new router is a more important constraint than the money needed to buy it).

The process starts with a path analysis to identify key nodes that must be SDN-enabled if a path is to be used for traffic engineering. For these paths, the paper presents “greedy algorithms” that test different migration scenarios for maximum performance gains under the different migration constraints. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ellison: Sparc M7 is Oracle's most important silicon EVER
'Acceleration engines' key to performance, security, Larry says
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.