Feeds

Bill Gates: Yes, Ctrl-Alt-Del salute was a MISTAKE

Billionaire software baron still smarting over 2001 on-stage burn?

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Vid Microsoft supremo Bill Gates has claimed that the ctrl-alt-del keystroke - once a way of admitting defeat in the face of crashing software - was a mistake all along.

Anyone with a passing knowledge of PCs will remember hammering those three keys to forcefully reboot the computer as code locked up. Some people even called the shortcut a three-fingered salute.

It later became the way to pull up the Windows task manager or log into the operating system, which may be an even more depressing activity that trying to perform a soft restart. (The thinking behind the login mechanism is that hitting the three keys together kicks the OS into running the official login program, meaning the user can trust the login prompt that pops up on screen is real and not a bogus one that'll steal your username and password.)

Speaking at the launch of the Harvard Campaign, a fundraising drive designed to raise $6.5bn for the Ivy League university, the Microsoft kingpin said he had originally wanted a single button to perform the ctrl-alt-del function.

"So we could have had a single button, but the guy who did the IBM keyboard design didn't want to give us our single button," Gates said. "So what we had, we programmed at a low level. It was a mistake."

IBM engineer David Bradley came up with the ctrl-alt-del mechanism, although the third key was originally intended to be escape rather than delete. He used the three-key combination so the reboot could not be trigger by accident.

"It was five minutes, 10 minutes of activity, and then I moved on to the next of the 100 things that needed to get done," he said earlier this year.

But don't forget that back in 2001, at a bash marking the 20th birthday of the IBM PC, Bradley quipped to his audience: "I have to share the credit [for ctrl-alt-del]. I may have invented it, but I think Bill made it famous.” Gates, who was sitting just feet away, didn't see the funny side... ®

Youtube Video

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.