Feeds

Flash biz and virtual database chum: Our tests show we bust spinning rust

Pure Storage and Delphix splatter platters in home-made benchmark

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

A flash array speed merchant and database virtualisation firm have got together to run a benchmark that shows their disk array brethren eating their dust.

Delphix takes a master database and makes virtual copies of it for whomever needs them, including accounting types, big organisations trying to control data spread, and testers and developers. The virtual copies consume far, far less space than full clone copies yet are just as functional. What's not to like?

Pure Storage, a flash array startup which has just bagged a cool $150m to build out its business and make better kit, has a core message about apps accessing stored data at NAND flash speed instead of using lots of oh-so-slow disk spindles – and at an affordable cost as well, since the boxes do inline deduplication.

The two have got together and compared database copies running on "a disk-based storage array from a leading legacy storage vendor" to a Delphix/Pure Storage double act using virtual copies on a flash array.

The disk array ran 26 copies of a database, each a terabyte in size and supporting 35,000 transactions a minute (TPM), 910,000 TPM overall, with an array cost of around $2m.

Our disk array dissing duo then ran the same 26 databases as a master with virtual Delphix copies on a Pure Storage flash array. Instead of a 26TB-plus capacity array they only needed 1.5TB of flash capacity in total, and supported around a million TPM at a cost of $200,000.

For 10 per cent of the cost and six per cent of the capacity of the disk drive array, they delivered more database TPM, and that's without saying anything about lower requirements for physical space, electrical power and cooling savings.

The two state: "Virtual flash databases can be created, refreshed, or rolled back in minutes, via self-service, by development or test teams. Block sharing across copies enables creation of large databases without duplication or movement of data across networks or arrays."

It may be a home-brewed benchmark, but it's food for thought. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
AWS pulls desktop-as-a-service from the PC
Support for PCoIP protocol means zero clients can run cloudy desktops
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.