Feeds

Flash biz Violin plays for $162m shower of notes - will rivals drown it out?

IPO at end of month, but upstart needs to be heard over the storage array din

Security for virtualized datacentres

Flash array startup Violin Memory wants to raise $162m in a stock-market debut, according to paperwork filed for its IPO.

Earlier this month rival Pure Storage received $150m in a funding round, which may or may not be significant in Violin's pricing calculations.

Other recent big-bucks flash-array news this month has included:

According to Investors.com Violin intends to sell 18 million shares priced between $8 and $10 apiece. That's 180 million at the high point, but the banks have to take their cut. At the $9 mid-point Violin would be capitalised at $877m.

As a reminder, Violin's mainstream storage competitors EMC and NetApp have their own acquired XtremIO and in-house built FlashRay products respectively, and HP has its own all-flash 3PAR 7450 array. There are also other flash array startups such as Nimbus Data, Skyera and SolidFire, and Fusion-io has a flash array capability with its NexGen acquisition.

Add all these to the mix and there's a whole orchestra of flash array players out there. Violin Memory will have to play a distinctive tune loud and strong to be heard. ®

New hybrid storage solutions

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.