Feeds

Microsoft, Nokia and the sound of colliding garbage trucks

$7.1bn... quite a hefty price tag for joined-up marketing

New hybrid storage solutions

Rhubarb, innovation, rhubarb, business agility, rhubarb

Following on from integrating Microsoft and Nokia into a single “unified voice”, Ballmer's next point on Wall Street's conference call saw some waffle about the efficiency of "being one company" on innovation: "The Lumia 1020 is awesome in terms of what it has for camera and imaging and yet I think as one company, we would have doubled down on that amazing, even greater range of software and services investment around the core hardware platform," Ballmer said.

And his third point? More waffle, on "business agility."

"As two companies,” said the Microsoft CEO, “we're making two independent sets of decisions about where and when and how to invest, by country, by operator, by price point."

Owning Nokia actually makes a mockery of the company's 2011 partnership on the Lumia range. Here's how Ballmer described the partnership with Nokia when the Finnish phonemaker killed its Linux and Symbian projects and picked Windows Phone: "Nokia and Microsoft working together can drive innovation that is at the boundary of hardware, software and services."

If we're to believe the marketing that's recently coming from Nokia and Microsoft, then the Lumia 1020 was one of the best phones of all time because it had a better camera than Android and iPhone. According to Microsoft, things were working, with the 1020 outselling BlackBerry in many markets - admittedly, not exactly a major achievement considering how badly BlackBerry is faring.

Why change?

This brings us back to justification, and based on Ballmer's justifications on Tuesday, the strongest justification we can see is marketing: one brand and a unified voice in the market. In other words, Microsoft just paid a heck of a lot for money for some unified marketing with a partner.

No, it seems Microsoft and Nokia needed each other. And, I'd suggest on that basis, Microsoft is too scared of handling its potential new possession too roughly in case it breaks the magic. Which brings us back to the faint rumble of garbage trucks colliding.

Nokia brings 32,000 employees to Microsoft's existing payroll army of 99,000. By any stretch of the imagination that will mean rationalisation - especially for a company like Microsoft that has been trying to contain costs with incremental staff cuts. But on its call with Wall Street, Microsoft was not giving anything away on where or when – or even if – the axe would fall.

Asked about a rationalisation, Ballmer passed the ball to chief financial officer Amy Hood, who dodged the question, saying Ballmer and Elop were being "thoughtful about the rationalisation so that we get to one voice, one brand and one team that can best execute and be efficient."

I'd have said "over to you Steve" but Ballmer's on the way out.

Pain certainly lies ahead: Ballmer said Tuesday his recently announced reorganisation remains "absolutely intact". But that's not true. Already, devices chief Julie Larson-Green, elevated under that re-org, is getting bumped down a notch by prospect of the incoming and soon-to-be former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop taking the division's top slot. Time will tell whether this CEO of a listed company will be happy playing a mere divisional role once again, or whether he covets the top job at Microsoft.

Adding further pressure: Ballmer's new structure must absorb an unknown and vast number of Nokia mobile and device employees – this will radically distort the structure of what has been until now a PC and server company.

According to Ballmer, who leaves in 12 months: "Stephen Elop will run the group and will take the appropriate steps with Julie, working with Stephen, to figure out appropriate integrations."

That's wishful thinking, because nothing is figured out so easily in a Darwinist corporate environment like Microsoft, where individuals and product groups vie for primacy and where we're told turf wars have already started on the news Ballmer was leaving.

So what can we conclude? That Microsoft is spending $7.1bn for unified phone marketing and help keep Windows Phone in the game. And, based on Sun's success with StorageTek, Microsoft will end up getting bought by Oracle. Well, maybe not the latter, but then I did say at the beginning – history doesn't repeat itself, you just get echoes from the past. ®

The next step in data security

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.