The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

New EU rules: Telco only SOMETIMES has to tell you it spaffed your data

Can't do it immediately? Do it later. Can't later? Give a, er, 'reasoned justification'

5 ways to reduce advertising network latency

New rules setting out the circumstances in which telecoms companies need to report personal data breaches, as well as the kind of information they need to share in those reports, have come into force.

The EU's Regulation on the notification of personal data breaches (7-page/756KB PDF) applies to all providers of publicly available electronic communications services, such as internet service providers (ISPs) and other telecoms companies, and sets new rules on notifying both regulators and customers about personal data breaches.

Under the Regulation all providers of publicly available electronic communications services in the EU will have to inform their competent national authority – which depending on where they are based may be the national data protection watchdog or communications regulator, for example – within 24 hours of detecting that they have experienced a personal data breach.

The companies would have to supply the regulator with a range of information about the breach, including the estimated date and time of the incident, the nature and content of the personal data concerned and how many individuals are affected.

If all the information that the Regulation states should be provided to regulators is unknown, the companies would be able to submit a partial initial notification within the 24-hour deadline and follow it up with a further notification that includes all the information required within three days of submitting that initial notification, unless it is not possible to meet this second deadline.

In those circumstances companies would have to offer regulators a "reasoned justification" for its failure to meet the notification requirements on time.

The telecoms providers will also generally have to notify individuals affected by a personal data breach "without undue delay" in cases where the breach is "likely to adversely affect the personal data or privacy" of those individuals.

Factors such as the type of personal data that has been breached, the likely consequences of the breach for individuals, and the circumstances of the breach, such as whether the data has been stolen or where the provider knows the information is in the hands of an unauthorised third party, should be assessed to determine where a breach is likely to adversely affect individuals' privacy, according to the Regulation.

However, telecoms providers would be able to avoid having to notify individuals if they can show regulators to their satisfaction that the use of "technological protection measures" has rendered the breached data "unintelligible to any person who is not authorised to access it".

The Commission previously said that it will publish "an indicative list" of the technological protection measures it would consider will render personal data unintelligible.

The new rules, which came into force on 25 August, were introduced by the European Commission in June. The Commission used "technical implementing measures" set out under the EU's Privacy and Electronic Communications (e-privacy) Directive to create the new rules after identifying inconsistencies in the old national systems for data breach notifications to which electronic communications service providers were subject.

At the time the Commission said that the purpose of the new rules was to "ensure all customers receive equivalent treatment across the EU in case of a data breach, and to ensure businesses can take a pan-EU approach to these problems if they operate in more than one country".

The UK's Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has outlined its intention to publish new guidance on the new framework "very shortly".

Technology law expert Luke Scanlon of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, previously said that the new data breach notification rules for telecoms companies could act as a useful test for the more widely applicable data breach notification regime envisaged under the reformed EU data protection framework that has been proposed.

A further set of data breach notification rules, not specific to personal information breaches, has also been proposed as part of the European Commission's draft Network and Information Security (NIS) Directive. The NIS Directive would apply to banks, energy companies, platforms for online trade and cloud computing providers and a number of other selected companies involved in the operation of critical infrastructure.

Copyright © 2013, Out-Law.com

Out-Law.com is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Supercharge your infrastructure

Whitepapers

5 ways to reduce advertising network latency
Implementing the tactics laid out in this whitepaper can help reduce your overall advertising network latency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Email delivery: 4 steps to get more email to the inbox
This whitepaper lists some steps and information that will give you the best opportunity to achieve an amazing sender reputation.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
5 ways to prepare your advertising infrastructure for disaster
Being prepared allows your brand to greatly improve your advertising infrastructure performance and reliability that, in the end, will boost confidence in your brand.

More from The Register

next story
EU move to standardise phone chargers is bad news for Apple
Faster than a speeding glacier but still more powerful than Lightning
NSA in new SHOCK 'can see public data' SCANDAL!
What you say on Twitter doesn't stay on Twitter
Great Britain rebuilt - in Minecraft: Intern reveals 22-BEEELLION block map
Cunning Ordnance Survey bod spent the summer bricking it
Google's boffins branded 'unacceptably ineffective' at tackling web piracy
'Not beyond wit' to block rip-offs say MPs demanding copyright safeguards
Hundreds of hackers sought for new £500m UK cyber-bomber strike force
Britain must rm -rf its enemies or be rm -rf'ed, declares defence secretary
Michael Gove: C'mon kids, quit sexting – send love poems instead
S.W.A.L.K.: Education secretary plugs mate's app
Report says PRISM snooped on India's space, nuclear programs
New Snowden doc details extensive NSA surveillance of 'ally' India
Highways Agency tracks Brits' every move by their mobes: THE TRUTH
We better go back to just scanning everyone's number-plates, then?
The target: 25% of UK gov IT from small biz... The reality: Not even close
Proud mandarins ignoring Cabinet Office's master plan, note MPs
US House Republicans: 'End net neutrality or no debt ceiling deal' – report
Leaked document reveals a shedload of anti-Obama demands
prev story