Feeds

Total cost of that axed NHS IT FIASCO to taxpayers: £10.1bn

Patient records system contract still grinding to a halt

Intelligent flash storage arrays

The shambolic nationwide NHS patient record computer system, abandoned by Whitehall in 2011, will ultimately cost UK taxpayers a staggering £10.1bn.

US-headquartered Computer Sciences Corporation (CSC), alongside UK telecoms giant BT, failed to fully implement the massive project, sparking widespread derision before the plug was pulled. The electronic health care record system was given a green light by the Department of Health in 2002.

But by August 2011, a damning report by Parliament's Public Accounts Committee urged then Health Secretary Andrew Lansley to scrap the system after £7.3bn from the public purse had already been spent.

By September of that year the NHS National Programme for IT (NPfIT) was axed. However, a few months after that decision was made, CSC claimed that it would continue to provide electronic patient records in some capacity to the NHS until 2017. The contract extension was said to cost a further £2bn to Brits.

The DoH defended the deal at the time by arguing that ending the contract with the company could, remarkably, be more expensive than allowing it to complete the bungled project.

Last year, CSC and the UK government finally reached a truce over the company's central patient database cock-up with both sides agreeing to a more flexible contract until 2016 and to shelve any potential litigation.

According to ehealth Insider, the final cost of NPfIT will cost £10.1bn to its "end of life", which is presumably 2017 when the government finally wiggles itself loose of the disastrous contract inked with CSC. The magazine obtained the figure from the DoH following a Freedom of Information request. In 2008, the UK government's National Audit Office reckoned the project would cost the public £12.7bn, but by 2012, this figure had been downgraded to £9.6bn.

The project was scrapped only after the government confessed that it had finally spotted the "weaknesses of a top-down, centrally-imposed IT system". ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.