Feeds

Icahn sues Dell's board over Big Mike's buyout bid

'Stop Mickey D' campaign fails to halt latest offer

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Activist investor Carl Icahn and his affiliates have filed a legal complaint against Dell and its board members in his latest attempt to thwart Big Mike's efforts to regain control of the PC behemoth.

Icahn filed in Delaware's Court of Chancery on a number of counts. One of these is a request for the court to to stop Michael Dell and his partners from counting any votes from shares that were bought after they announced their bid to take the firm private.

It's likely that Icahn and his partners, Southeastern Asset Management, reckon that anyone who bought shares in Dell after the buyout offer was on the table did so because they wanted to vote for it.

The ticked-off investors are also pushing for a declaration from the board that it breached its fiduciary duties to stockholders by postponing the vote on the deal from 24 July without scheduling the firm's already late AGM, at which board members could be changed. Icahn and his affiliates want damages from Dell and the board for any losses they caused.

Getting the annual general meeting scheduled has been one of Icahn's main campaigning tactics against the buyout offer, which he and his partners view as too low. An AGM would give them the opportunity to propose their own picks for the board.

The shareholder vote on Mike's offer to take the firm private at $13.65 per share has already been postponed twice and is now scheduled for later today.

The most recent delay came when Dell (the man, rather than the firm) offered to raise the bid by 10c a share, if the voting rules were changed to allow shareholders who abstained from the vote to be discounted.

As it stands, abstained votes are counted as voting against the deal. But the firm's special board committee rejected the rule change, which had been met with outrage from major investors.

Meanwhile, Reuters reports that a buyout deal for $13.75 per share and a special dividend of 13c per share is "close", according to a familiar person. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Premier League wants to PURGE ALL FOOTIE GIFs from social media
Not paying Murdoch? You're gonna get a right LEGALLING - thanks to automated software
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer quits Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.