Feeds

Wikipedians say no to Jimmy's 'buggy' WYSIWYG editor

Thanks, but it's quicker to hand-code our edits

The essential guide to IT transformation

Wikipedia editors are rejecting the online encyclopaedia's much-anticipated and hyped Visual Editor en masse.

The expensive software project, funded by donations to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), is a WYSIWYG editor intended to make the open-source resource more accessible. Traditionally, editing Wiki requires a knowledge of complex markup syntax. The Visual Editor (VE) is a flagship project intended to broaden Wikipedia's appeal to potential contributors, and arrest a long-term decline in active editors.

“Visual Editor is a user interface that is much more familiar to people. When you click edit you get something that looks very much like any word processor, and you can change things and do whatever you want,” Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales boasted to the Daily Telegraph.

"It is actually very good, and easier for quick copyedits on complicated articles. And I know how damn hard everyone involved is working on it," UK Wikipedian David Gerard assured his fellow editors. After a beta test last December, the code was rolled out as a default for new users two weeks ago.

But the Visual Editor, which has been a long time coming, looks anything but a fabulous upgrade.

"The software is buggy, slow, and not likely to be fixed anytime soon," states the unofficial Visual Editor request for comment. Editors describe VE as "an expensive extravagance", and rue "three years of wasted resources". Many complain of it discarding their edits, others of missing features and poor performance.

It's so slow and buggy, in fact, that editors have voted not to use it. Last weekend hundreds of German Wikipedia editors rebelled. VE has been made the default editor, which requires users to opt-out to get back to the old markup system, and they want to see this reversed. 442 users (87.7 per cent) voted to roll-back VE deployment so that it's opt-in, with just 29 (5.8 per cent) voting to stay the course.

A similar resolution proposing VE is disabled for new accounts registered from the UK had won 80 votes in its support last night - with just two voting against. One of those two votes was from Wikipedia figurehead, socialite Jimmy Wales. The current tally at the time of writing is 200 for the opt-out, versus 16 for opting in.

Many tech-savvy Wikipedians work in IT, and are not short of positive suggestions for off-the-shelf, open-source replacements for WMF's Visual Editor. But they're running into a problem: Wikipedia's institutional chumocracy.

Ultimate responsibility for the car crash belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation's “Deputy Director and VP of Engineering and Product Development”, Erik Möller. Möller was one of the first participants in the project in 2001 and today is probably the second most influential personality at Wikipedia [see his Wiki bio here]

Just don't expect to hear much about VE when Wikipedia kicks off this year's donation drive. ®

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.