Feeds

Wikipedians say no to Jimmy's 'buggy' WYSIWYG editor

Thanks, but it's quicker to hand-code our edits

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Wikipedia editors are rejecting the online encyclopaedia's much-anticipated and hyped Visual Editor en masse.

The expensive software project, funded by donations to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF), is a WYSIWYG editor intended to make the open-source resource more accessible. Traditionally, editing Wiki requires a knowledge of complex markup syntax. The Visual Editor (VE) is a flagship project intended to broaden Wikipedia's appeal to potential contributors, and arrest a long-term decline in active editors.

“Visual Editor is a user interface that is much more familiar to people. When you click edit you get something that looks very much like any word processor, and you can change things and do whatever you want,” Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales boasted to the Daily Telegraph.

"It is actually very good, and easier for quick copyedits on complicated articles. And I know how damn hard everyone involved is working on it," UK Wikipedian David Gerard assured his fellow editors. After a beta test last December, the code was rolled out as a default for new users two weeks ago.

But the Visual Editor, which has been a long time coming, looks anything but a fabulous upgrade.

"The software is buggy, slow, and not likely to be fixed anytime soon," states the unofficial Visual Editor request for comment. Editors describe VE as "an expensive extravagance", and rue "three years of wasted resources". Many complain of it discarding their edits, others of missing features and poor performance.

It's so slow and buggy, in fact, that editors have voted not to use it. Last weekend hundreds of German Wikipedia editors rebelled. VE has been made the default editor, which requires users to opt-out to get back to the old markup system, and they want to see this reversed. 442 users (87.7 per cent) voted to roll-back VE deployment so that it's opt-in, with just 29 (5.8 per cent) voting to stay the course.

A similar resolution proposing VE is disabled for new accounts registered from the UK had won 80 votes in its support last night - with just two voting against. One of those two votes was from Wikipedia figurehead, socialite Jimmy Wales. The current tally at the time of writing is 200 for the opt-out, versus 16 for opting in.

Many tech-savvy Wikipedians work in IT, and are not short of positive suggestions for off-the-shelf, open-source replacements for WMF's Visual Editor. But they're running into a problem: Wikipedia's institutional chumocracy.

Ultimate responsibility for the car crash belongs to the Wikimedia Foundation's “Deputy Director and VP of Engineering and Product Development”, Erik Möller. Möller was one of the first participants in the project in 2001 and today is probably the second most influential personality at Wikipedia [see his Wiki bio here]

Just don't expect to hear much about VE when Wikipedia kicks off this year's donation drive. ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
Bladerunner sequel might actually be good. Harrison Ford is in it
Go ahead, you're all clear, kid... Sorry, wrong film
Euro Parliament VOTES to BREAK UP GOOGLE. Er, OK then
It CANNA do it, captain.They DON'T have the POWER!
Musicians sue UK.gov over 'zero pay' copyright fix
Everyone else in Europe compensates us - why can't you?
I'll be back (and forward): Hollywood's time travel tribulations
Quick, call the Time Cops to sort out this paradox!
Megaupload overlord Kim Dotcom: The US HAS RADICALISED ME!
Now my lawyers have bailed 'cos I'm 'OFFICIALLY' BROKE
Forget Hillary, HP's ex CARLY FIORINA 'wants to be next US Prez'
Former CEO has political ambitions again, according to Washington DC sources
prev story

Whitepapers

Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Internet Security Threat Report 2014
An overview and analysis of the year in global threat activity: identify, analyze, and provide commentary on emerging trends in the dynamic threat landscape.