Feeds

Google SELLS OUT the INTERNET HIPPIES! AGAIN!

Net Neutrality campaigners shocked, shocked

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

+Comment Google is fighting a legal battle to prevent its Google Fiber subscribers from running servers on their network - and "net neutrality" sympathisers are shocked and appalled.

In the T&Cs for Google's 1GB fibre service, the T&Cs clearly state:

Your Google Fiber account is for your use and the reasonable use of your guests. Unless you have a written agreement with Google Fiber permitting you do so, you should not host any type of server using your Google Fiber connection, use your Google Fiber account to provide a large number of people with Internet access, or use your Google Fiber account to provide commercial services to third parties (including, but not limited to, selling Internet access to third parties).

An individual who is not a Google Fibre customer - because it isn't available in his city - and who states his occupation as "Innovator", shot off a lengthy complaint (PDF) to the FCC arguing that Google violated the FCC's order 10-221, the "net neutrality" rule. The complainant, Doug McClendon, frankly admitted he had not read the order itself:

"Ok, so maybe I haven't slowly, or even completely read every word of 10-201," he admitted in his original filing. But having "skimmed" the rule, he had come to the conclusion that Google violates a legal doctrine McClendon himself has invented, which he calls the "Right to Serve".

In response, Google has told the Federal Communications Commission (PDF) it is merely doing what everyone else does: including rivals AT&T, Comcast and Verizon.

Heroically, McClendon had pre-empted this response in his original complaint (p15). Other ISPs may frown on residential servers, but that's by the by.

The self-styled "internaut*" pleads:

I am in fact trying to shame Google into doing something, that I believe they have the money and power to get away with not doing if they don't want to. In other words, I believe the equal and equally legally unenforceable language in other residential ISPs' terms of service is just as in need of fixing.

Strangely, the internaut adds that his eldest (unnamed) brother "…is a (non-GoogleFiber-related) Vice President at Google alongside Milo Medin in charge of Google Fiber".

Which means Thanksgiving Day is going to be fun over in Kansas. All the same, betrayal abounds:

"That’s not what the net neutrality fight was about," writes Ryan Singel in his account of the dispute at WiReD.

"The fight was intended to make broadband services act like utilities that don’t care what a packet contains or what router, computer, phone or device you use, so long as you aren’t hurting the network."

The Network Neutrality "fight" was actually about many things, depending on who you talked to and at what time of day. For some it was about applying a Rawlsian concept of "justice" to internet packets - so that every packet is treated equally: a weird, synthetic human rights struggle. But it was generally aligned with the interests of OTT players sticking it to the telcos. Google funded and lobbied for "net neutrality" in DC and in Europe.

Should Oompah-Loompahs subsidise over-the-top competitors?

Now Google is a telco, it finds its expedient to stick it to other OTT players. As long-time Google critic Scott Cleland points out:

Google’s current effective net neutrality stance — that a competitive broadband provider can reasonably prohibit a potential competitor from using Google’s Internet access network to compete against Google Fiber — is an important implicit recognition that competitive broadband providers have no regulatory obligation to subsidize over-the-top competitors to their various businesses.

Google adds that it's giving punters 1GB of fibre, with no data caps. So standard network management policy is reasonable. Anyone who doesn't like it can lump it.

In fact as we pointed out three years ago, Google dumped the net neutrality "hippies" in 2008 when it began to build its own infrastructure to support YouTube.

The internet is not a "thing"; it's fundamentally a set of interconnection agreements, ensuring that private and public networks interconnect and co-operate.

(Internetworking. The clue's in the name.)

Internet application technology has advanced at such a clip that modern streaming video simply can't be carried satisfactorily over the public backbone. And today, Google is the largest private network in the world, which gives it a lot of clout. It has also spent a lot of capital on showpiece Fibre — giving it even more clout.

As Alan Patrick, the former McKinsey analyst, first pointed out when Google last angered the net neutrality campaigners in 2010, by signing a rapprochement with Verizon, such a sense of betrayal is both naive and misplaced:

So all the gnashing of teeth and wailing, calling Google a 'Surrender Monkey' is to me a sign of tech bloggers being either largely incompetent or asleep at their terminals for the last 2 years.

Make that five years, Alan. ®

* First coined by Vint Cerf

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
Vodafone to buy 140 Phones 4u stores from stricken retailer
887 jobs 'preserved' in the process, says administrator PwC
BT claims almost-gigabit connections over COPPER WIRE
Just need to bring the fibre box within 19m ...
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
Surprise: if you work from home you need the Internet
Buffer-rage sends Aussies out to experience road rage
EE buys 58 Phones 4u stores for £2.5m after picking over carcass
Operator says it will safeguard 359 jobs, plans lick of paint
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.