Feeds

Rackspace won't match Amazon on prices

But will vigorously market against them!

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Amazon's relentless campaign of price cutting has forced a response from one of its rivals, with Rackspace arguing that price is not the sole factor that should matter when choosing a dedicated cloud instance.

In a blog post published on Tuesday, Rackspace's chief technology officer John Engates indulged in a few paragraphs of counter-marketing, following Amazon massive price cut to its dedicated instances last week.

The post sought to highlight the differences between Amazon's "dedicated" instances, and Rackspace's.

We'll go into those differences shortly, but it bears noting that in competitive markets, incumbents deal with an aggressive younger entrant in the following ways: first they ignore it, then they don't acknowledge it but compete with it, then they start spreading fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) about it.

Rackspace now appears to be in the third phase of this cycle, and uses the blog post to make some legitimate and some not-so-legitimate points about the differences between its cloud and AWS.

While Amazon's dedicated EC2 instances give you your own gear, you're still consuming larger parts of AWS's public cloud such as the network, Engates says, whereas on Rackspace you're "completely isolated from the public cloud." The company's servers are more customizable than Amazon instances, which are served up as prepackaged options.

"EC2 dedicated instances live on the same class of commodity servers as do regular EC2 instances," Engates says, whereas Rackspace's dedicated servers are backed by uptime guarantees and SLAs, and use different hardware – Rackspace's largest dedicated server is based on a Dell R820, while many of its cloud servers are built on commodity hardware assembled by companies such as Quanta.

In other areas, the claims are more dubious: Rackspace says "you can scale up to 1.5 terabytes (yes, that's terabytes) of RAM and as many as 32 CPU cores" on a bare metal server. But "scaling up" generally implies a fluid, quick step-up for larger resources, which doesn't happen on bare metal without migration to another system, or the use of a hypervisor to portion-out workload.

By our measures, dedicated server providers such as Rackspace and Softlayer almost certainly represent a better deal for dedicated equipment than cloud providers such as Amazon, but due to Amazon's size and influence in the market, whenever it shifts prices, its competitors need to respond.

These companies also lack the constellation of secondary services for their clouds that Amazon has, so although performance on dedicated instances may be superior, the overall choice for cloud technologies is more limited.

The company also indicated it won't compete with Amazon on price – or in Rackspace's wording, "A lower unit price doesn't always mean lower costs overall. Nor does it always deliver value when one considers an apples-to-apples comparison of performance and support. We at Rackspace don't aspire to offer the lowest unit prices."

Though many of Rackspace's dedicated server options can work out to be cheaper than AWS's dedicated slices of EC2, not tying the prices together is significant for both Rackspace customers and competitors.

We tried to get a firm response out of Rackspace on whether they would or would not peg themselves to Amazon for pricing, and after a couple of emails Engates told us, "As I said in the post we don't aspire to be the low unit cost provider ... we believe we already offer a lower total cost in many instances and certainly superior value for most customers when you think about the Fanatical Support we include and all the other performance and reliability benefits."

"Most of our customers that have gravitated to Rackspace from AWS find that when they added up all the 'nickels and dimes' they spend with Amazon it doesn't come out cheaper and it's way more complicated to calculate and predict their spend at AWS," Engates said.

Rackspace's counter-marketing highlights both the incredible dominance Amazon has come to wield over the cloud industry, and also the perils of being forced into a position where you have to react to the actions of a competitor. Given Amazon's patient shareholders who have pushed the value higher despite repeated price cuts to its AWS services, we forecast more blog posts like this as cloudy marketing tries to distract from Amazon's thunder. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
NASA launches new climate model at SC14
75 days of supercomputing later ...
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
DEATH by COMMENTS: WordPress XSS vuln is BIGGEST for YEARS
Trio of XSS turns attackers into admins
Cloud unicorns are extinct so DiData cloud mess was YOUR fault
Applications need to be built to handle TITSUP incidents
BOFH: WHERE did this 'fax-enabled' printer UPGRADE come from?
Don't worry about that cable, it's part of the config
Astro-boffins start opening universe simulation data
Got a supercomputer? Want to simulate a universe? Here you go
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.