Feeds

Poor iPhone sales mean Verizon could owe Apple $14bn

Financial data shows massive money hole

The essential guide to IT transformation

Verizon is facing a massive financial shortfall because it isn't selling enough iPhones, according to analysis from Moffett Research.

Apple demands that network partners commit in advance to buy a certain number of handsets before it agrees to do business with them. Sprint, for example, agreed in 2011 to spend $15.5bn on iPhones over a four-year period – a target Moffett Research analyst Craig Moffett said he expects Sprint to reach easily.

But a trawl though Verizon's 20-F SEC filings for the last four years shows that the telecoms giant is rather deeper in the hole. Between 2009 and 2010 Verizon's purchase commitments grew from $300m (average for a company of this size) to $45bn over three years. While Moffett has identified around $5bn of this purchasing assigned to other companies, the bulk of it looks likely to be down to Apple, he said.

"Few if any other handset suppliers require purchase commitments of this kind, and, again, it is noteworthy that the total commitment was almost zero until Verizon contracted with Apple for the iPhone for the first time," his blog post reads.

Now Verizon is selling a lot of iPhones, but not that many – especially since all the major US networks now have the handsets for sale. Verizon's purchase commitments for 2013 are listed at $23.5bn, which is more than double its iPhone sales for the previous year, and assuming sales remain the same, Verizon faces a shortfall of between $12bn and $14bn.

There's no real benefit to Apple in taking a hard line with Verizon, Moffett notes, but it must do something for fear of establishing a precedent for dealings with other network providers. It'll be after some return, Moffett predicts, but how much depends on the vicissitudes of Tim Cook and his Cupertino team.

"We certainly don't expect that Verizon will have to write a check to Apple for $12 billion or so to make good on its seemingly inevitable shortfall," Moffett concludes. "However, it seems likely that Apple will extract at least some consideration for a contract shortfall of this apparent magnitude." ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
Judge nixes HP deal for director amnesty after $8.8bn Autonomy snafu
Lawyers will have to earn their keep the hard way, says court
Ex-IBM CEO John Akers dies at 79
An era disrupted by the advent of the PC
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.