DARPA uncloaks unTerminator for $2 million robotics challenge

ATLAS hugs

Build a business case: developing custom apps

DARPA has unveiled a 330-pound, six-foot two-inch tall ATLAS humanoid robot designed to save the lives of its fleshy counterparts in disaster areas, and will let seven teams of developers loose on it to compete in a $2m Robotics Challenge contest in December.

ATLAS robot from Boston Dynamics

"Come with me if you want to live."

The ATLAS robot, built by Boston Dynamics, was born out of the 2009 DARPA-funded PETMAN project to use humanoid robots for testing chemical-warfare clothes. But after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster, the development focus was switched to using the system in disaster situations to save human lives.

As with the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident, human controllers at Fukushima stayed on the job to avert a more catastrophic disaster at the facility, exposing themselves to extreme levels of radiation. Retired staff even volunteered to return and risk their own health to replace younger members of the team.

DARPA set up the Robotics Challenge contest requirements to design a robot that could operate in environments designed for humans but which were inimical to them. The successful robot will have to drive a vehicle over various terrain, clear a blocked doorway, and open it using its hands.

Once inside the test area, the robot will have to traverse rubble-strewn walkways, climb up a ladder or stairs, find and close a rotating industrial valve, attach a fire hose to a faucet and deploy the nozzle, or break through walls to kill Sarah Connor reach otherwise inaccessible areas.

Seven teams enter, one robot leaves

The ATLAS robot has a head of LIDAR and stereo sensors, an on-board control computer for balance and control, a 28-joint articulated body, and modular wrists that accept third-party hands. The robot is tethered, however, to provide enough power for full operation and communications links back to the controller.

The seven teams, which include competing techies from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and Johnson Space Center, MIT, and Caltech, have had software simulation of the ATLAS system to play with for the last month and now are getting the hardware to try out their algorithms on. Judging from DARPA's video, a rave club might be a good testing ground.

"Simulator tasks were fairly accurate representations of real world causes and effects, but the experience wasn't quite the same as handling an actual, physical robot," said Gill Pratt, program manager for the DARPA Robotics Challenge.

But the teams don't just have to use DARPA's designs; the contest is open to new robots too. The contestants are split between B and C teams, who will use the ATLAS robot, and the A teams who can design their own robots to do the job better.

It's a longstanding complaint in the robotics industry that humans aren't designed well from a mechanical standpoint (very unstable, limited joint movement and a highly vulnerable sensor package on top – not to mention locating the sewage works next to the playground) so several teams think they can improve on the design.

Carnegie Mellon University will be submitting the CMU Highly Intelligent Mobile Platform (CHIMP), a four-armed/legged robot with caterpillar tracks, which it thinks can do the job better than a humanoid robot, albeit with a communication link back to its controller.

"The progress the Track A teams have made so far is incredible given the short timeline DARPA put in place," said Pratt.

Trickle down

In December, the first trials for the $2m prize will take place, using either ATLAS or the A team's own designs. If no one can meet all the challenge goals, the contest will be repeated a year later, and presumably every year after that if no one manages to complete the tasks.

Such long contest periods aren't uncommon. The 2004 DARPA challenge contest to build a self-driving car took a couple of years to crack, as did its urban driving contest. Many of the winning teams went to Google, which is why you'll see automated cars certified for California's highways in 2017.

DARPA has a good record in the benefits of challenges like this and the ATLAS robots will no doubt be getting jiggy in time for the December competition. El Reg expects there'll be no winners this time round but the technology has potential, which will hopefully not be misapplied. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Boffins attempt to prove the UNIVERSE IS JUST A HOLOGRAM
Is this the real life? Is this just fantasy?
Our LOHAN spaceplane ballocket Kickstarter climbs through £8000
Through 25 per cent but more is needed: Get your UNIQUE rewards!
China building SUPERSONIC SUBMARINE that travels in a BUBBLE
Shanghai to San Fran in two hours would be a trick, though
LOHAN tunes into ultra long range radio
And verily, Vultures shall speak status unto distant receivers
SpaceX prototype rocket EXPLODES over Texas. 'Tricky' biz, says Elon Musk
No injuries or near injuries. Flight stayed in designated area
Galileo, Galileo! Galileo, Galileo! Galileo fit to go. Magnifico
I'm just a poor boy, nobody loves me. But at least I can find my way with ESA GPS by 2017
EOS, Lockheed to track space junk from Oz
WA facility gets laser-eyes out of the fog
prev story


Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.