Feeds

Xyratex CEO: Don't judge us by our droopy revenues

Our 'core businesses are making money'

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

Xyratex's second quarter revenues were a third less than a year ago, as were its first quarter revenues. With sales to NetApp continuing to decline and income from the new ClusterStor array still not covering its costs, Xyratex is set to shrink further this year.

Revenues for the second calendar quarter were $216.2m, compared to $322.1m a year earlier; 11 per cent higher than the $195.6m recorded in Q1 2013. Don't take too much comfort from that, though, as in three of the last four years there has been a Q1 to Q2 rise in revenues, showing a seasonal pattern.

This year's first quarter revenues were 34 per cent lower than last year's, so we're seeing a steady decline of a third, year-on-year, in Xyratex's quarterly revenues so far this year.

The company managed to scrape a relatively tiny profit - it controlled its costs better - of just 1.34 per cent of revenues, at $2.9m. There was a $5.1m loss in the first quarter and a $7m profit a year ago, representing 2.2 per cent of revenues. This profit ends two quarters of losses.

Xyratex said the profit primarily reflects "a favourable variation in product mix in both our Enterprise Data Storage Solutions and Hard Disk Drive (HDD) Capital Equipment product segments."

A minor tweak, then.

Xyratex Revenues and Profits to Q2 cy2013

If the next two quarters show the same pattern of a third less revenue than a year ago then Xyratex's full 2013 year results will be around $774m compared to full year 2012's $1.16bn.

The company booted out its CEO Steve Barber in April, under pressure from activist investor Baker Street Capital Management. Ernie Sampias became interim CEO, a post he still holds, and Baker Street's Vadim Perelman joined Xyratex's board. A colleague at Baker Street, Ken Traub, has just been appointed to the board as well.

Baker Street has said in the past that Xyratex's development of its HPC ClusterStor array has been a waste of resources. So, now what are the new broom interim-CEO and Baker Street board guru saying?

Sampas's canned results statement talked of a detailed analysis of Xyratex business by himself, Perelman and Traub, and said this:

Our core businesses of Capital Equipment and Storage Solutions are both profitable and cash generative. I am encouraged by the longer term opportunities for growth in these businesses. The gradual revenue decline from our previously largest customer NetApp will cease after 2014 and this revenue is being replaced with new OEM business wins.

With our new ClusterStor product line, which addresses the HPC/Big Data marketplace, we have achieved incremental design wins, added a number of new customers in just the last 3 months and are on course to meet our revenue target of $60m in fiscal 2013. I am very encouraged that ClusterStor is approaching the inflection point where, as revenue ramps year over year, the product line can generate a positive contribution to the overall business.

I can also confirm that the Board is unanimously supportive of our long-term growth strategy.

In reference to another famous Baker Street resident, El Reg's storage desk says, "No shit, Sherlock."

Let's translate this guffery. Xyratex's mainstream Capital Equipment and Storage Solutions business units make money. The new ClusterStor business, derided in January by Baker Street, is now the key to future growth and investment in it continues. So why did the board get rid of Steve Barber if nothing's going to change?

Xyratex shares rose 1.54 per cent to $10.53 on news of the results; they have been languishing below $12.00 for most of the past twelve months, peaking at $12.79 in August 2012. They peaked at $17.74 last year and $19.91 in 2010. How is the existing board and interim CEO going to get the stock price back up to those giddy heights if they just stick with the steady-as-we-go strategy they're pursuing?

Sampias confirmed that a search is underway for a new permanent CEO. El Reg's storage desk speculates that this will continue only up to the point Xyratex is sold off in its entirety, or broken into bits and sold. Selling it in three bits - Capital Equipment, Storage Solutions, and ClusterStor - looks to be the likeliest option from where we sit. ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
Better be Nimble, tech giants, or mutant upstarts will make off with your sales
Usual suspects struggling to create competing products
VMware vaporises vCHS hybrid cloud service
AnD yEt mOre cRazy cAps to dEal wIth
prev story

Whitepapers

A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Maximize storage efficiency across the enterprise
The HP StoreOnce backup solution offers highly flexible, centrally managed, and highly efficient data protection for any enterprise.
How modern custom applications can spur business growth
Learn how to create, deploy and manage custom applications without consuming or expanding the need for scarce, expensive IT resources.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.