Feeds

US Supremes sit on hands in $625m patent case, hand Apple victory

Mirror Worlds' world shattered

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

The US Supreme Court has handed Apple a victory in its long-running patent-infringement battle with Mirror Worlds LLC, declining to review a lower court's decision to overturn a $625.5m judgment that had been leveled against Cupertino.

The Supremes made no comment on the case, merely lumping it into a list of 157 cases released on Monday morning for which it merely said "The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied" – meaning, in legalese, "No, we're not going to let you try to convince us to overturn the overturning of the original decision. You lose. Go home."

The case was originally filed in the famously plaintiff-friendly US District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, in March 2008. Mirror Worlds alleged that Apple had infringed up four of its patents – 6,725,427, 6,638,313, 6,006,227, and 6,768,999 – but by the time that court's jury had reached its verdict, the allegations had been whittled down to the first three, which Mirror Worlds said that Apple had infringed upon for its Spotlight search, Cover Flow item-display, and Time Machine automated backup features.

In October 2010, the jury in that trial agreed with Mirror Worlds, concluded that Apple's infringement was "willful", and granted damages of $208.5m per patent. Apple – surprise! – objected, and challenged the judgment.

In June 2011, Apple got its way when a judge in the same Tyler, Texas, division threw out the whole $625.5m ball of wax, saying that although Mirror Worlds' patents were, indeed, valid, Apple didn't infringe upon them. "Mirror Worlds may have painted an appealing picture for the jury," US District Court Judge Leonard Davis wrote in his decision, "but it failed to lay a solid foundation sufficient to support important elements it was required to establish under the law."

Mirror Worlds cried foul, and escalated the case up to the US Supreme Court. And on Monday it received word that the Supremes weren't interested in reviewing Davis' decision.

Interestingly, just last month a New York IP acquisition and licensing company, Network-1, bought Mirror Worlds LLC's patent portfolio – well, actually its "newly formed subsidiary, Mirror Worlds Technologies, LLC" bought them – for $3m and stock-warrant considerations.

Network-1 can't be happy with Monday's denial of the writ of certiorari. But don't feel too sorry for them – their website notes that their "current focus is on Power over Ethernet (PoE)," so keep your eye on that space in the next round of patent wars. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.