Feeds

Big Blue blows big green in SoftLayer public cloud gobble

If you can't beat them, eat them. And make them move to OpenStack

Next gen security for virtualised datacentres

So much for that whole strategy that cloud biz SoftLayer came up with (of building its own cloud controller and basing its server fleet entirely on Super Micro iron): because Big Blue bought SoftLayer today for an undisclosed sum.

Rumors were going around back in March that both IBM and EMC were sniffing around SoftLayer - a privately held company based in Dallas that has around 25,000 customers and a server fleet of over 100,000 machines growing by 20,000 per year. SoftLayer operates 13 data centers, most of them in co-location facilities, and IBM's FAQ on the deal says the unique customer count is more like 21,000 at the company.

IBM did not say how much it offered to pay for SoftLayer in its statement announcing the deal, but the rumors three months ago had the number at north of $2bn. AT&T was also previously interested in acquiring SoftLayer before EMC and IBM showed up, according to various reports at the time. AT&T wants to be a bigger cloud provider like all the big telcos, and EMC may have been interested in a way to get VMware its own public cloud in quick and dirty fashion.

IBM's acquisition of SoftLayer, which is on track to do maybe $400m in revenues in 2013 by El Reg's estimates, is a tacit admission by Big Blue that it cannot reach its goal of hitting $7bn in cloud services revenues by 2015 without buying revenue streams and customer bases. IBM does not provide specific statistics for its SmartCloud public cloud, but it is safe to say that the operation is considerably smaller than the one that SoftLayer started building in 2007.

The combination of SoftLayer and IBM Global Services will do a number of things. Most of SoftLayer's data centers are in the United States, with recent expansion into Amsterdam and Singapore. So now SoftLayer will have a global reach when merged with IBM's SmartCloud operation and other outsourcing facilities that Big Blue runs around the world for customers.

SoftLayer has also created its own bare metal and cloud provisioning tools, and these could be very valuable to IBM as it tries to handle big data, HPC, and other workloads where a virtualization layer is a hindrance rather than a help. IBM could keep this provisioning technology to itself, or contribute it to the open source OpenStack cloud controller effort, which Big Blue has just backed in a big way. IBM promised back in March that it was shifting from its own homegrown SmartCloud controller, which was developed before OpenStack got its start, to OpenStack.

It will be interesting to see what happens to the SoftLayer server strategy of buying machinery exclusively from whitebox king Super Micro. IBM has its own System x server line, of course, but has been trying to unload it for maybe $5bn or $6bn to Chinese PC and server maker Lenovo Group. It would be very interesting indeed if IBM did manage to sell off the System x business to help pay for other cloud acquisitions (Rackspace Hosting is an obvious second move) and shifted to using whitebox machines in its data centers. Or, even more interesting would be a move to Open Compute designs for its cloudy data centers, as Rackspace is doing and SoftLayer was contemplating.

No matter what, this is probably not a good deal for Super Micro.

IBM is also saying that it will bring social, mobile, and big data apps to the SoftLayer cloud for those existing 21,000 customers to consume.

IBM expects to close the SoftLayer deal in the third quarter, and when that is accomplished it will merge its SmartCloud operations with SoftLayer to create a new Cloud Services Division. Erich Clementi, who has run various partner-facing businesses as well as IBM's midrange server and mainframe lines, has been tapped to run this division. Clementi is currently senior vice president of Big Blue's Global Technology Services division, and the cloud business will be tucked in there. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Top 8 considerations to enable and simplify mobility
In this whitepaper learn how to successfully add mobile capabilities simply and cost effectively.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.