Feeds

No Dell, no EMC? Well, HP's storage champ then

Beats IBM at poorly attended storage benchmark party

The essential guide to IT transformation

A HP 3PAR system is top of the storage heap in the SPC-1 benchmarks for storage systems costing less than $200,000 and also achieved a top price/performance ranking. Of course, many of the big boys failed to make a showing, so we're not sure how valuable the crown is.

Out of all systems submitted to the Storage Performance Council, the HP StoreServ 7400 wiped the floor with IBM's Storwize V7000, scoring 258,078.23 IOPS - more than double the Storwize's 120,492.34. It also left other mid-range systems trailing far behind, as the chart below shows.

The SPC-1 benchmark provides a cross-supplier rating of how well a storage array performs typical business-critical storage applications. HP submitted its 3PAR, or StoreServ 7400, system and its average latency was 0.86 milliseconds - with controller performance nudged up by SSDs.

The IOPS rating was 114 per cent of IBM's Storwize V7000 and 106 per cent of HDS' HUS 150 array, which scored 125,018.87 IOPS with a $1.59/IOPS price/performance rating.

SPC-1 MId-Range IOPS May 2013

HP got its pricing right, with its dollars/IOP rating ($0.58/IOP) standing at almost a third of the Storwize's $1.50/IOP.

A Huawei Dorado 2100 splits the two with its $0.98/IOP rating, but Huawei's future as a storage supplier in the US is under question, giving the Chinese company's view that its US operations are being downgraded, according to a Financial Times report quoting its exec VP Eric Xu at a New York financial analyst summit in April.

Mid-Range SPC-1 dollars per IOP May 2013

The 7400 also comfortably beat the HUS 150's $1.59/IOP.

Obviously, some of the big suppliers are missing here, such as Dell, and EMC. The performance of Dell's Compellent and EMC's VNX arrays are not being exposed to the SPC-1 searchlight.

Moving away from mid-range considerations, the 3PAR 7400 has scored the second-best $/IOPS rating of all the SPC-1 benchmarks, with its $0.58/IOP only bested by an all-solid state Kaminario K2's $0.40/IOP.

The K2 holds the SPC-1 IOPS record at 1,219,973.91, about five times more than the 7400's 258,078.23 IOPS.

It makes El Reg's storage desk wonder what an SSD-assisted high-end 3PAR 10,000 system would achieve. Kaminario should feel threatened.

You can view the results of the SPC-1 tests on its website. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Community chest: Storage firms need to pay open-source debts
Samba implementation? Time to get some devs on the job
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.