Feeds

Tech firm CEOs more restrained than most at limiting personal pay

Except Larry Ellison, of course

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

If you want to see the greatest disparity between the average worker and the CEO's pay packet, America is the place to be. But while the heads of many blue-chip US firms cash in more than most, the country's technology bosses are more abstemious.

Since 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission has required publicly-traded companies to produce figures on the ratio of the CEO's pay to that of the median pay level of their staff. The latest figures on the top 250 corporate pay disparities in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, analyzed by Bloomberg, shows barely ten technology firms in the top 100 companies, and some big names not even making the rankings.

According to data from the AFL-CIO trade-union organization, which each year analyses corporate pay levels, the average ratio of CEO pay to that of their staff rose from 42:1 back in 1982 to 354:1 last year. Of the companies on the list, the CEOs of only nine technology firms were greedier than this.

Top of the tech list is, of course, Oracle's Larry Ellison – a man who surely doesn't need the money but likes everyone to know how much he's worth. Larry took home $96.2m last year, creating a CEO/worker ratio of 1,287 – making him fourth on the list behind the bosses of JCPenney, Abercrombie & Fitch, and the Simon Property Group.

The next highest tech CEO greed-head, 15th in the rankings, is eBay's John Donahue, whose $29.7m pay packet is 656 times his median worker's wage. Other big names taking more than their share include the CEOs of Viacom and Comcast, with Qualcomm's boss Paul Jacobs getting the CEO/staff ratio spot on the national average of a 354:1 score.

Meanwhile, companies such as Intel, Dell, HP, Xerox, and IBM all keep their CEO salary rations lower than 400:1. Right at the bottom of the 250 company list is William Sullivan, CEO of Agilent Technologies – home of the smart people from HP who saw which way the wind was blowing and jumped ship – with a CEO to staff ratio of 173, which is more in keeping with HP's original corporate ideas before Fiorina reinvented the company.

Firms such as Microsoft and Google don't feature in this list, largely due to the peculiarities of their management. Google's Page and Brin only paid themselves a dollar in salary last year, as is their habit, and Steve Ballmer pays himself less than $2m in direct wages, although he has a private stock portfolio estimated to be worth well over a billion dollars.

There are also some late pay announcements that didn't make it onto the list. Last month, games publisher Activision Blizzard's CEO Robert Kotick announced he was raising his executive compensation from $8.33m last year to $64.9m – which given the parlous pay of people at the sharp end of the games industry must make the company's CEO/worker pay ratio among the highest in the land.

The list isn't perfect, of course – it only covers a very limited subset of CEOs. The heads of the top 25 US hedge funds, for example, are reported to have shared $14.4bn in wages last year, the bulk of designated as lowly-taxed carried interest, and private firms don't have to release their data.

You could well argue that Larry Ellison has a perfect right to pay himself oodles of cash. After all, he cofounded Oracle and is the driving force behind its success. If he wants to take money out of his firm to spend on hauntingly beautiful boats or a Hawaiian island or two then that's his business.

But Larry's an outlier – in more ways than one – and looking through the list the fattest cats of the CEO clowder, there aren't many who have Ellison's credentials. Most are CEOs who inherited a company and convinced the board that this is what they are worth.

Meanwhile, for IT workers in the trenches, pay rates have remained stagnant or have dropped over the last 14 years. It's got to stick in the craw somewhat when staff are being asked to work longer hours for less pay (even forced to buy their own hardware) and suffer shakier job security when this mantra only seems to apply to the workers, not the bosses. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.