Feeds

Lehman Brothers sues Intel over a billion dollar deal

Bankrupt bank claims tech firm breached swap agreement

Security for virtualized datacentres

Bankrupt investment firm Lehman Brothers is suing Intel over accusations that it had seized $1bn in collateral in breach of a swap agreement.

The bank synonymous with the global financial meltdown told New York's bankruptcy court in a filing that Intel had taken more than its fair share out of its subsidiary Lehman Brothers OTC Derivatives (LOTC) after it went bust.

According to the filing, the firms had an agreement back in 2008 whereby LOTC would give $1bn to Intel in exchange for 50.5 million of Chipzilla's shares to be delivered at the end of September that year.

LOTC said it had posted the $1bn as a cash collateral as part of the deal, which also said that Intel would be compensated for any losses if either party ditched the deal early.

Intel is claiming that that compensation amounted to $1bn in Intel common stock, but Lehman says the deal was for 50.5 million shares, regardless of what price they were at.

"The value of 50,552,943 shares of Intel common stock on Sept. 29, 2008 was about $873 million, not $1 billion," LOTC said.

The bank said that Intel was only entitled to cover its losses "reasonably determined by Intel in good faith".

"Intel’s reasonable losses as a result of terminating the swap agreement were far less than $1 billion," it said.

"Nonetheless, on September 29, 2008, Intel unlawfully seized, and has refused to return any portion of, the $1 billion cash collateral posted by LOTC under the swap agreement, and the nearly $2 million in interest that had accrued thereon as of the Settlement Date."

Lehman is looking for a pile of cash which it claims was "wrongfully seized" by Intel, the amount "to be determined at trial", plus interest, lawyers' fees and, of course, damages.

Intel had not returned a request for comment at the time of publication. ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
Hungary's internet tax cannot be allowed to set a precedent, says EC
More protests planned against giga-tariff for Tuesday evening
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.