Feeds

Object Storage: A solution in search of a problem?

This industry deserves an OSCAR

Security for virtualized datacentres

Blocks and Files Generally, it seems to me that object storage is suffering from a failure to launch despite more than a dozen suppliers pushing it.

Many of these same vendors seem to have their heads in the sand with regard to their place in the marketplace - they seem to ignore the fact that end-user buyers are confused about what object-storage really is, how it gets purchased (and why) and how it gets used.

Here's a quick and brief run-down of vendors and their object storage activities:

  • Amazon - biggest object storage user?
  • Amplidata - object startup which has landed Quantum OEM deal
  • Caringo - object storage startup which landed and then three years later lost a Dell OEM contract
  • Cleversafe - talks massive scalability with a 10EB store and 1TB/sec ingest rate
  • Dell - cancels Dx6000 object storage product and makes Caringo software available as a download
  • DDN - says its WOS can be cheaper than Amazon storage
  • EMC - Centera --> Atmos --> Project Bourne and HDFS - something big stirring
  • Exablox - startup whose object storage underpins CIFS/SMB access protocol
  • HDS - object is a key part of its strategy and is in the mainstream of HDS development
  • HP - has its own object technology
  • IBM - nothing, zip, nada except maybe vague hints of GPFS having object connections
  • NEC - has Hydrastore technology using erasure coding and focussed on deduped backup
  • NetApp - StorageGRID but no visible activity
  • Quantum - OEMing Amplidata as its Lattus object store in StorNext and as alternative to tape
  • Scality - object startup that's landed SGI and Penguin as OEMs and expands its technology's relationships energetically
  • SGI - offers Scality RING as object store inside its gateway file location virtualising appliance

Quantum with StorNext and SGI with its gateway have a media and entertainment and oil and gas market presence respectively.

What is the function of object storage? Variously:

1. Alternative to tape for archive
2. Alternative to file systems for very large populations of files
3. Alternative to RAID-based data protection schemes offering greater storage efficiency and lower rebuild times
4. Aid to dedupe via object storage algorithms and hence better storage efficiency

Disadvantages and problems

1. No industry-standard object interface equivalent to, say, CIFS or NFS with files
2. No agreed storage role and not enough storage pain being felt by users/vendors to drive its adoption and development more strongly
3. Complex technology that can be hard to understand
4. No support/commitment from IBM
5. Seemingly lackadaisical support from NetApp
6. Disengagement from Dell

There could usefully be an industry Object Storage Computing Adoption Resource (OSCAR!) to provide general support and encouragement for object adoption, kind of like the Active Archive Alliance. Vendors seem to agree something more can and should be done - yet they are not doing anything about it.

The general idea I have is that object storage generally is suffering from a failure to launch despite good technology because users and mainstream vendors are not feeling the pain of problems from filesystem technologies or tape enough to do anything substantial about it.

There is pain, surely, and it needs to be surfaced and made visible.

For object storage to generally prosper we need clearly-defined object storage use cases where filesystem technology is obviously not suitable, even if that means a filesystem access protocol is used layered on top of a backend object store, and where tape is clearly inferior for a users' needs.

Come on object storage industry; you have common problems and need to get together and sort them out. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.