Feeds

Ginni blasts 'slow' IBM staff after poor Q1 results

Rometty tells Big Blue sales bods to move faster to close deals

Boost IT visibility and business value

IBM chief Virginia Rometty has issued a company-wide dressing-down to staff who are "too slow", after the firm's disappointing first quarter results.

Rometty sent off a five-minute internal video message to IBMers, seen by the Wall Street Journal, where she blamed the company's sales staff for the results, saying they failed to get ink on the page for a number of potential deals.

"As the quarter ended, hundreds of millions of dollars of software and mainframe opportunities, they didn't close - and in a number of cases because we didn't move fast enough," she said.

"We were too slow to understand the value and then engage on the approval and the sign-off process [for one big software pitch].

"The result? It didn't get done."

The Big Blue head said that if a client were to have any requests or questions in the future, IBM had better have a response ready within a day.

"And if anything slows you down, call it out. Engage management, engage leadership and let's deal with it," she told staff.

IBM has already warned its "under-performing" storage crew that it will be taking "substantial actions" to sort out that area of its business and Rometty has also switched the head of corporate strategy with the head of systems and technology in a bid to shake things up.

The boss wasn't all doom and gloom in her video pep talk, saying that the company's strategy was "the right one" and "fundamentals are strong".

"I know we will confront this honestly and with urgency, and moments like this are when IBMers rise to the occasion. We don't retreat; we go on the offense," she added.

Big Blue missed its first quarter targets after expected income from mainframe systems and related software deals, along with patent licences, had to be rolled over into the second quarter.

CFO Mark Loughridge blamed everything from the timing of the Easter holidays to the political power change in China in a conference call with analysts, but also admitted that the firm had had sales execution problems in certain markets.

IBM declined to comment on the staff video. ®

Build a business case: developing custom apps

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Barnes & Noble: Swallow a Samsung Nook tablet, please ... pretty please
Novelslab finally on sale with ($199 - $20) price tag
Banking apps: Handy, can grab all your money... and RIDDLED with coding flaws
Yep, that one place you'd hoped you wouldn't find 'em
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Primetime precrime? Minority Report TV series 'being developed'
I have to know. I have to find out what happened to my life
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.