Feeds

Google U-turn DID preempt ICANN's block on corporate gTLD-snatchers

.search, .blog, .cloud and .app safeguarded for 'public interest'

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

It's official - Google did indeed correctly judge that ICANN would halt corporate attempts to exclusively snatch generic top level domain names for commercial use.

The internet overlord, which is charging companies to take control of new suffixes to supplement the established TLDs such as .com, .org and .uk, said (PDF) at a meeting in Beijing, China last night:

For strings representing generic terms, exclusive registry access should serve a public interest goal.

Google had previously attempted to gain exclusive access to four generic top-level domains (gTLDs). But, as we were first to report earlier this week, the ad giant - in a screeching U-turn - changed its application after it was warned late last year that such a plan would be rejected.

ICANN explained that the governmental advisory committee - which steers decision-making at the not-for-profit org - had identified a "non-exhaustive list of strings that it considers to be generic terms" where exclusive registry access is sought by the applicant.

They include four gTLDs that Google is bidding for: .app, .cloud, .blog and .search.

And, ahead of the "safeguard advice" offered to ICANN about a number of generic namespaces, Google resubmitted its bid for .app and .search and confirmed that it would shortly alter its .blog and .cloud applications, too.

The rehashed applications stated that Google would, if successful in its bids for the gTLDs, operate in a more "inclusive" way with its competitors. Google has declined to comment about its tactical switch for trying to bag the four gTLDs it has resubmitted applications for.

Meanwhile, Amazon will be watching proceedings in Beijing closely. The company applied for the generic top level domain namespace .book - which has now been flagged up by ICANN as a gTLD that should be safeguarded from exclusive ownership because it needs to "serve a public interest goal." ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Brit telcos warn Scots that voting Yes could lead to HEFTY bills
BT and Co: Independence vote likely to mean 'increased costs'
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Blockbuster book lays out the first 20 years of the Smartphone Wars
Symbian's David Wood bares all. Not for the faint hearted
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
prev story

Whitepapers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.