Feeds

Judge: Facebook must see Timelines Inc in court over trademark

Just want to punch you really hard in the Face ... bitch

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Facebook has failed to convince a judge to toss out a trademark infringement lawsuit regarding the free content ad platform's use of the term "Timeline".

Timelines Inc, which created a website in 2009 that records and shares historic events, flung a sueball at Facebook in late 2011 when it alleged that Mark Zuckerberg's company was violating its trademark and competing unfairly.

The legal row was ignited within a week of Facebook debuting its Timeline feature on its network, which claims more than 1 billion users worldwide.

Facebook later tried to countersue Timelines Inc by claiming that the term was not distinctive enough to be valid for protection under trademark law.

But US District Judge John Darrah in Chicago disagreed with Facebook. He said in an opinion and order ruling on Monday:

Defendant has failed to demonstrate as a matter of law that plaintiff’s trademarks are either generic or merely descriptive, or that defendant’s use of the term 'Timeline' was a fair use.

Judge Darrah, in reaching his conclusion, noted that Facebook had "regularly referred to its 'Timeline' as a product and marketed its 'Timeline' in a manner that a reasonable jury might find to be trademark use."

He continued:

Moreover, genuine issues of material fact remain regarding defendant’s use of the term 'Timeline' in good faith, as evidence demonstrates that defendant was aware of plaintiff’s registered trademarks and defendant’s CEO commented that defendant 'wanted to punch anyone who tried to compete with [Facebook] in the face really hard' ...

The judge had apparently quoted Zuckerberg, who - in advance of the company's f8 developer conference in September 2011 - supposedly said that Facebook was focusing on two things:

[A]ll the stuff we want to do (products), and also wanted to punch anyone who tried to compete with us in the face really hard. You have to teach people who compete with you 'don't even fucking bother.'

Judge Darrah denied Facebook its motion for a summary judgment and the Timelines Inc versus Facebook Inc case [PDF] has a jury trial date set for 22 April. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Microsoft EU warns: If you have ties to the US, Feds can get your data
European corps can't afford to get complacent while American Big Biz battles Uncle Sam
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.