Revealed: Vendors’ worst sales fluff
Gartner's ‘Non-differentiators rarely substantiated with credible evidence’
Posted in Management, 27th March 2013 23:37 GMT
Free whitepaper – Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement
Reg readers often show little love for analysts, labelling them over-priced prognosticators with tenuous ties to reality.
But a new Gartner blog post on "Useless Sales Pitch Slides" may win back some favour, as it reveals the six worst pieces of meaningless marketing messaging vendors put before the firm, and those to whom they sell.
Vice-president and distinguished analyst Rolf Jester’s list comprises:
- Global presence
- End-to-end offering
- Solution provider
- Focused on business value-add
- Trusted partner for our clients
- Our people
These terms are toxic, Jester says, because they aren’t in any way related to what buyers want or need.
“They are typically mostly meaningless and irrelevant,” he writes. “They are so common to all sales pitches that they have become white noise washing over the audience. Not only do people ignore them, they actually switch off and miss the unique gems of business value you are undoubtedly about to share with them.”
He goes on to label them “non-differentiators … rarely substantiated with credible evidence.” Worse yet, if vendors try to explain them, “An attempt to do so would likely just show up their emptiness anyway.”
The same might just be said of Gartner’s own “magic quadrant” or “trough of disillusionment”.
Jester seems on safer ground with his point about “our people” as a particularly hard differentiator to sustain, as any company making that claim surely cannot point to rivals’ hiring policies as favouring ex-con junkies with faked educational accomplishments. ®
Free whitepaper – Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement
COMMENTS
Analysts Analyzed
I'd like to see Gartner do an analysis of analysts to determine the biggest bullshit terms they use.
Also missing in action...
Outcomes, stakeholders, result-orientated, taking ownership, our human capital, leverage (especially when pronounced 'levverige') , etc, etc, ad nauseum.
While there are doubtless sales guys out there who care, most in my experience are just trying to flog the tatt de jour to get their commission. If it happens to coincide with a customer's requirements, well that's a plus.
Unfortunately...
"There buzzwords are out"
is usually a precursor to
"These buzzwords are in".
Waiting to be "positively incorporated" into the next "target-oriented vocabulary" any moment now...
the Reg Hack is too kind...
"labelling them over-priced prognosticators with tenuous ties to reality."
Is about the most politically-correct, gender-neutral, polite description of the real sentiment to "Sales" , and for that matter "Anal-ists" you see here.
Another phrase to get rid of:
"Face time". (icon seemed appropriate).
I've got a manager that repeatedly talks of Face Time - not getting enough, needing more, scheduling some in - ironically, usage of the phrase is a good way of ensuring that no-one wants to give him any.
For more phrases that need to be restructured going forward, see "Death Sentences" and "Weasel Words" By Don Watson.

The new Office Garage series: