Feeds

Health pros: Alcohol is EVIL – raise its price, ban its ads

Hooch 'brings forth a whole world of harm'

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

A broad coalition of UK health organizations has released a report detailing the evils of demon rum (and whisky, vodka, brandy, gin, lager, ale, wine, et al.), and calling for a series of government actions to suppress its use, including sharply increased pricing and a ban on alcohol advertising and sponsorships.

"In developing this strategy, we considered the best available evidence about appropriate policies and interventions that are needed both to reduce drinking levels in individuals and reduce the damage to families and communities that alcohol can cause," said Sir Ian Gilmore, chairman of the Alcohol Health Alliance, when announcing the report, entitled "Health First: An evidence-based alcohol strategy for the UK".

"The pleasure of alcohol, for those who choose to drink, is clear," the report admits, but its very next sentence expresses the alarm that pervades the entire 55-page document: "Yet alcohol also brings forth a whole world of harm."

That world of harm is an expensive place, the report contends. "The personal, social and economic cost of alcohol has been estimated to be up to £55bn per year for England and £7.5bn for Scotland," it claims.

"Health First" goes on to itemize the harms to which it refers: premature death, cirrhosis of the liver, heart disease, cancer ("of the head, mouth, neck, liver, breast and bowel"), falls, burns, drowning, poor mental health, depression, alcoholism, relationship breakdowns, domestic violence, car wrecks, impoverishment, harm to children, antisocial behavior, crime, disorder, the transformation of cities' downtowns into "no-go areas", costs to public services, "and the substantial impact of alcohol-related absenteeism on productivity and earnings."

The Reg is tempted to remark that such a litany of horrors is enough to drive a man to drink, but we have too much sophistication to stoop to such a glib cliché.

The report focuses its strategies for reducing alcohol consumption on what it calls the "four Ps" of marketing – price, product, promotion, and place. Of those, price is paramount. "The simplest way to reduce demand for alcohol," the report argues, "is to put the price up. Like most consumer products, demand for alcohol is inversely related to its price."

Cover image from 'Health First: An evidence-based alcohol strategy for the UK'

The report's cover wastes a perfectly good glass of wine

Advertising takes its lumps, as well. "The pervasive marketing of alcohol products in the UK is indefensible," the report asserts. "Only a complete ban on all alcohol advertising and sponsorship will make a lasting difference."

"Health First" makes 30 specific recommendations intended to curtail alcohol use, ranging from "forward planning" of the number, density, and opening hours of all licensed watering holes, to random breath-testing of drivers, to eliminating "happy hours". Of those 30, it elevates selected recommendations to its "Top Ten", as follows:

  1. A minimum price of at least 50p per unit of alcohol should be introduced for all alcohol sales, together with a mechanism to regularly review and revise this price.
  2. At least one third of every alcohol product label should be given over to an evidence-based health warning specified by an independent regulatory body.
  3. The sale of alcohol in shops should be restricted to specific times of the day and designated areas. No alcohol promotion should occur outside these areas.
  4. The tax on every alcohol product should be proportionate to the volume of alcohol it contains. To incentivise the development and sale of lower strength products, the rate of taxation should increase with product strength.
  5. Licensing legislation should be comprehensively reviewed. Licensing authorities must be empowered to tackle alcohol-related harm by controlling the total availability of alcohol in their jurisdiction.
  6. All alcohol advertising and sponsorship should be prohibited. In the short term, alcohol advertising should only be permitted in newspapers and other adult press. Its content should be limited to factual information about brand, provenance and product strength.
  7. An independent body should be established to regulate alcohol promotion, including product and packaging design, in the interests of public health and community safety.
  8. The legal limit for blood alcohol concentration for drivers should be reduced to 50mg/100ml.
  9. All health and social care professionals should be trained to routinely provide early identification and brief alcohol advice to their clients.
  10. People who need support for alcohol problems should be routinely referred to specialist alcohol services for comprehensive assessment and appropriate treatment.

The report's recommendations may sound draconian to some, but "Health First" argues that the majority of the public is on the authors' side, citing a 2012 survey conducted by the UK polling organization YouGov.

"The British people may have a long-standing relationship with alcohol," the report notes, "but this does not blind them to the harms that it causes: 61 per cent of respondents said that they thought this relationship is unhealthy." The highest percentage of "unhealthy" respondents, by the way, was in Northern Ireland and Scotland, where the report said "alcohol consumption per capita is relatively high."

In addition, 92 per cent thought that alcohol had "a great deal" or "a fair amount" of impact on disorderly and anti-social behavior, 67 per cent agreed that is was important to conduct promotional campaigns to raise awareness of the harms of alcohol, and 57 per cent said that alcohol products should be required to include warning labels.

When it came to increasing the price of alcohol, however, the public balked. Only 35 per cent said that drinks should be more expensive, and 22 per cent thought they should instead be cheaper.

The authors of "Health First" are undaunted by this public reluctance. "We need to be ambitious not only in tackling the price of alcohol," they write in their summary, "but also in regulating alcohol products, eliminating alcohol promotion and controlling the overall availability of alcohol in our communities." ®

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
JINGS! Microsoft Bing called Scots indyref RIGHT!
Redmond sporran metrics get one in the ten ring
Driving with an Apple Watch could land you with a £100 FINE
Bad news for tech-addicted fanbois behind the wheel
Murdoch to Europe: Inflict MORE PAIN on Google, please
'Platform for piracy' must be punished, or it'll kill us in FIVE YEARS
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Sony says year's losses will be FOUR TIMES DEEPER than thought
Losses of more than $2 BILLION loom over troubled Japanese corp
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.