The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Apple, Facebook, Google: Same-sex marriage 'a business imperative'

HP's Whitman and top GOPpers also prod Supremes on marriage equality

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Updated Apple, Facebook, Intel, Google, Oracle, Cisco, Verizon, eBay, and Qualcomm are among at least 60 top US companies that will file a brief with the US Supreme Court in support of the plaintiffs in a case that seeks to invalidate as unconstitutional laws banning same-sex marriages.

"Recognizing the rights of same-sex couples to marry is more than a constitutional issue. It is a business imperative," argues a draft of the amicus brief obtained by Fortune.

The case, Hollingsworth v. Perry, was filed in opposition to California's Proposition 8, a state constitutional amendment that passed in 2008 but was overturned by the US District Court for the Northern District of California, in a decision that was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The case has since wended its way up to the US Supreme Court.

The companies petitioning the Supremes base their argument on competitive needs. "By singling out a group for less favorable treatment," the draft continues, "Proposition 8 impedes businesses from achieving the market's ideal of efficient operations – particularly in recruiting, hiring, and retaining talented people who are in the best position to operate at their highest capacity."

According to the draft, discrimination against same-sex marriages puts US companies in states with anti–same-sex marriage laws in a non-competitive position when competing for the best and the brightest "in places where all couples, regardless of whether they are of the same sex, are afforded equal access to marriage."

The brief also notes that such discriminatory laws are not merely anti-business in that they harm recruiting. It also notes that "increased wedding celebrations can mean additional revenue for many businesses," up to and including "businesses that benefit from increased tourism from guests who travel to the wedding."

But business needs are not the only reason for the companies' objections; there are principles involved, as well. Such laws, the draft argues, "send an unmistakeable signal that same-sex couples are in some way inferior to opposite-sex couples, a proposition that is anathema to amici's commitment to equality and fair treatment to all."

The opposition by Apple and Google to such laws is no surprise. Apple opposed Proposition 8 back in 2008, as did Google. What is perhaps more surprising was the revelation on Tuesday that at least 75 prominent Republicans – including HP CEO Meg Whitman – also filed an amicus brief in support of overturning laws banning same-sex marriage.

Whitman, Californians and others might remember, supported the implementation of Proposition 8 when she ran for governor of that state in 2010 – but she has now changed her mind. In a Thursday post on LinkedIn, Whitman explained her change of heart.

In that post, she called marriage "the single greatest contributor to the well-being of adults and children because it promotes eternal principles like commitment, fidelity and stability." She now believes that "It makes no difference whether the marriage is between a man and woman or a woman and woman. Marriage makes society better."

Whitman also recalled a quote by UK prime minister David Cameron, whose political views are likely closer to her own than they are to, say, President Obama. "Conservatives believe in the ties that bind us; that society is stronger when we make vows to each other and support each other," Cameron said at a 2011 Tory conference. "So I don't support gay marriage despite being a conservative. I support gay marriage because I am a conservative."

Speaking of Obama, the two amicus briefs now put the ball firmly in his court, as his administration has yet to formally weigh in on Hollingsworth v. Perry. Time is running out for Obama to make his thoughts known – oral aruments in the case are set for March 26.

It's your move, Mr. President. Which side are you on? That of some of the most powerful of your country's companies and a passel of prominent Republicans, or those filed by the Family Research Council and the Foundation for Moral Law?

Over four dozen amicus briefs have been filed so far, and it's not even March yet. Should Obama finally file his, odds are good that it will be treated with more respect than the one filed by the Westboro Baptist Church, of "God Hates Fags" fame. ®

Update

On Friday morning, Obama-administration officials said that the Justice Department would file an amicus brief later in the day that would express the administration's support for declaring Proposition 8 unconstitutional.

Cloud based data management

"Personally a business should not care if you are married, single, gay, straight, bi or whatever. They should also not ask about your age, your religion or anything else. If you want to tell people then that's another matter."

Seriously? Did you miss the point of their argument by that much? What they said was: if a company is in a state that bans gay marriage, a gay person is less likely to come work for that company, thus harming their business. They want the best people, regardless of whether they are gay or not, and so would like these obstacles to free movement to be removed.

13
0

Re: Really

" From what I've heard, it's a "don't ask/don't tell" type of thing in the Arab world."

No, it's more a case of "Don't ask/ don't get assaulted, flogged, stoned or murdered" type of thing.

10
0
Anonymous Coward

Personally a business should not care if you are married, single, gay, straight, bi or whatever. They should also not ask about your age, your religion or anything else. If you want to tell people then that's another matter.

So long as you aren't doing something illegal or that will serious conflict with your job or cause public outcry then what business is it of theirs?

Lets not forget some of the recent sex scandals caused by people who were seen as being charitable types.

12
2

More from The Register

 breaking news
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
BBC lied to Parliament about doomed £100m IT monster, thunder MPs
Axed DMI ballooned and burst while watchdogs sang Kumbaya
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
 breaking news
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Silicon Valley digiterati to brainstorm at 30,000 ft
Nothing spurs creative thinking like 11 hours in a flying tube
Confidence in US Congress sinks to lowest level ever recorded
So why the %$#@! do we keep re-electing the same politicians?