Feeds

Barnes & Noble to sling their Nook - report

Insider sheds light on B&N moves ahead of Q3 results on Thursday

Build a business case: developing custom apps

As Barnes & Noble prepare investors for disappointing quarterly results on Thursday, the company will move away from making hardware and put more emphasis on shifting digital books, a New York Times source says.

The company - America's biggest bookseller and the maker of the Nook tablet - has announced that yearly revenue for the Nook division (device sales and ebooks) will be below the $3bn predicted, and that the division will once again make a loss. B&N issued the advice ahead of its full Q3 results on Thursday.

B&N had a total revenue of £7.1bn in the fiscal year 2012. Revenue from Nook sales and digital content sales in 2012 was $933m for the full year in 2012, with the division making an overall loss of $261.7m. It seems like the division was unable to pull off the tripling of sales expected this year, and crucially, that the division was unable to turn a profit.

Recent holiday results for the Christmas just gone showed Nook section revenues fell by 12.6 per cent in the nine-week period to Christmas, compared to the year before. It was the device that was dragging profits down: digital content sales increased 13.1 per cent, but Nook device unit sales declined compared to the prior year.

Since the tablet was launched in 2009, Barnes & Noble has put significant investment into producing the Nook hardware and platform. But it looks like the forthcoming gloom will force the bookseller to change its policy:

“They are not completely getting out of the hardware business, but they are going to lean a lot more on the comprehensive digital catalog of content" said the NYT source.

The death of the Nook hardware would remove one small-scale competitor from the cut-throat tablet market, where it is hard to compete against Amazon, Apple and Google. B&N's deal with Microsoft in April last year could signal a direction for the Nook as a etail store rather than a physical device. ®

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Video of US journalist 'beheading' pulled from social media
Yanked footage featured British-accented attacker and US journo James Foley
Caught red-handed: UK cops, PCSOs, specials behaving badly… on social media
No Mr Fuzz, don't ask a crime victim to be your pal on Facebook
Ballmer leaves Microsoft board to spend more time with his b-balls
From Clippy to Clippers: Hi, I see you're running an NBA team now ...
Online tat bazaar eBay coughs to YET ANOTHER outage
Web-based flea market struck dumb by size and scale of fail
Amazon takes swipe at PayPal, Square with card reader for mobes
Etailer plans to undercut rivals with low transaction fee offer
Assange™: Hey world, I'M STILL HERE, ignore that Snowden guy
Press conference: ME ME ME ME ME ME ME (cont'd pg 94)
Call of Duty daddy considers launching own movie studio
Activision Blizzard might like quality control of a CoD film
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.