Feeds

Study: Packing heat increases odds of being shot in assault

'Guns did not protect those who possessed them from being shot'

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

3 Big data security analytics techniques

The US gun-control debate may have both sides shooting their mouths off, gunning for each other, going off half-cocked, and [insert tiresome idiom here], but a group of biostatisticians and epidemiologists decided to cut through the cant and apply rigorous research to one critical question: does carrying a gun increase your safety?

"On average," the researchers concluded, "guns did not protect those who possessed them from being shot in an assault." The finding was published in an American Journal of Public Health paper entitled, straighforwardly enough, "Investigating the Link Between Gun Possession and Gun Assault".

"Although successful defensive gun uses can and do occur," the report contends, "the findings of this study do not support the perception that such successes are likely."

The researchers, all from the University of Pennsylvania, conducted their study with a stated goal of determining "the possible relationship between being shot in an assault and possession of a gun at the time." To do so, they investigated 3,485 shootings "of all types" in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from October 15, 2003, to April 16, 2006.

The researchers then excluded self-inflicted, unintentional, and police-related shootings, plus gun injuries of undetermined intent. They further narrowed their study sample by age – no one under 21 and therefore not able to legally own a gun, for example – and other factors, which reduced the sample to 2,073 shootings. They then randomly selected 677 of those for further study, and paired each of those participants with "population-based control participants." A detailed description of the study's painstaking methodology can be found here.

The resulting data, after suitable massaging, revealed a clear result. "[I]ndividuals in possession of a gun were 4.46 (P < .05) times more likely to be shot in an assault than those not in possession. Among gun assaults where the victim had at least some chance to resist, this adjusted odds ratio increased to 5.45 (P < .05)."

That's the hard numerical analysis. The paper also offers what it characterizes as "a few plausible mechanisms" by which possession of a gun might increase a person's risk of being involved in a gun assault.

A gun may falsely empower its possessor to overreact, instigating and losing otherwise tractable conflicts with similarly armed persons. Along the same lines, individuals who are in possession of a gun may increase their risk of gun assault by entering dangerous environments that they would have normally avoided. Alternatively, an individual may bring a gun to an otherwise gun-free conflict only to have that gun wrested away and turned on them.

Those explanations, however, will be left to the University of Pennsylvania's Department of Psychology and others to ponder. That institution's biostatisticians and epidemiologists, however, have produced a purely statistical result: if you're packing heat, and someone assaults you with a gun, you're more likely to be shot than if you were unarmed. ®

Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction

More from The Register

next story
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Lavabit loses contempt of court appeal over protecting Snowden, customers
Judges rule complaints about government power are too little, too late
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
Banks slap Olympus with £160 MEEELLION lawsuit
Scandal hit camera maker just can't shake off its past
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.