Brocade: California taxman took off with our profits
Never mind, revenues are up ... plus fibre is sexy again
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Storage networking and Ethernet supplier Brocade has grown its latest quarter's revenues but swung from profit to loss after changes to the state of California's tax code. It reckons it will soon be doing even better now on the back of its 16GBit/s Fibre Channel kit and added that software-defined networking has opened up a whole new raft of opportunities.

Revenues for the first fiscal 2013 quarter, ended 26 January 2013, were $588.7m - a record and a 5 per cent increase on the year-ago quarter. We would have expected net income of around $60m but instead there was a $21m loss due to the tax slurp.
A recent change in the California tax code reduced Brocade's deferred tax assets. There was a non-cash tax charge of $78.2m, due to the passage of Proposition 39 by the voters of California. Take $21m from that and we're left with what would have been a nominal $57m profit.
The company said Storage Area Networking (SAN) business revenue, including products and services, was a record $416.9m, up 3 per cent year-over-year.
IP Networking business revenue, including products and services, was $171.8m, up 11 per cent year-over-year, "principally due to lower Ethernet switch sales into the US federal government, which is typical in the company's first fiscal quarter." Within the IP networking business Ethernet switch revenue was up 18 per cent annually. Routing revenue was up 5 per cent and other IP Networking revenue was up 25 per cent driven by higher ADX (application delivery products) sales.
CFO Dan Fairfax said in the earnings call that he thought SAN revenue would go down in the short term: "For Q2, we expect SAN revenue to be down 5 per cent to 8 per cent sequentially … For the full fiscal year, we continue to see encouraging demand trends for the SAN market and expect year-over-year growth of 2 per cent to 5 per cent." The decline was attributed to Brocade's seasonal pattern of revenues. He thought IP networking revenue would not change in the forthcoming quarter.
Incoming CEO Lloyd Carney, 30 days into the job, sees great potential to grow revenues. One reason is this: "As long as storage demands increase, the demand for Fibre Channel will also increase."
Jason Nolet, Brocade's Data Centre Networking Group VP, pointed out Cisco was expected to introduce a 16Gbit/s Fibre Channel product line, despite its previous emphasis on getting Fibre Channel traffic sent over Ethernet, FCoE. The installed base of Fibre Channel users want faster Fibre Channel and not, so far, FCoE, Brocade said.
Carney chimed in here too: "FCoE didn't take over the world and they've [Cisco] drawn back from that, and FCoE now has got [to be] a bit part player in the overall scheme of things. … Cisco said Fibre Channel is dead. Well, Fibre is not dead anymore." Brocade said it's working with every major flash vendor to get Fibre Channel access certified.
Carney also sees opportunities in data centre fabrics, software-defined networking and next-generation products for SAN and campus networks because "networks have to evolve from the rigid, monolithic and proprietary entities they are today to be more open, dynamic and agile."
He said: "If you look in data centre, going forward, the firewall is going to be a piece of software. The switch is going to be a piece of software. The router is going to be a piece of software."
Answering a question about what Brocade might do he referred to Gartner's data centre networking infrastructure Magic Quadrants: "They had us there in the visionaries section, ahead of everyone, and there's no one in that top right quadrant. So that's us for us to go and take." He expects cloud service providers and the carriers to adopt new styles of data centre fabrics first, ahead of the financial sector companies, Brocade's traditional early adopters.
He also agreed that it was quite possible "a year from now that the composition of the business could look very different."
For example, El Reg speculates, Brocade could withdraw from the server host bus adapter (HBA) business where it hasn't made much impact if any on market leaders Emulex and QLogic.
There's a new high-end switch coming, with Carney saying: "We're going to have new high-end switching capability as well as new software content that is focused on manageability and diagnostics and visibility in the fabric end-to-end, right from the servers all the way to the storage targets. And we're not quite ready to announce that today."
On staffing Brocade is looking for a new head of sales and a new head of marketing. Outgoing CEO Mike Klayko had dispensed with the sales boss Ian Whiting last year. Carney said: "We're prioritising the VP of sales. And I'd be very surprised if we didn't have decision made on a candidate and candidate onboard within the next 30 days. Right behind that is VP of marketing and we've started that exercise and our process."
None of this sounds like Carney is positioning Brocade for a sale. In fact Carney says Brocade "is poised to take off." Okay Lloyd, take off. We're watching. ®
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
COMMENTS
Actually a company can have a deferred tax asset or a deferred tax liability. It's an accounting mechanism to 'smooth' out the impact of timing differences, where the tax code starts taxing things in a different way to the accounting standards. Without accounting for deferred tax, these differences would lead to unexpected volatility in your profit & loss account, so a company recognises a deferred tax asset or liability on its balance sheet, then unwinds that against the current tax differences in future years.
If the accounting and tax code differences will benefit you in the future, you can recognise a deferred tax asset; if you'll be worse off in the future, you recognise a deferred tax liability.
In this case, it looks like the company had a deferred tax asset that was no longer going to crystallise a benefit in the future due to the recently changed law - hence they reduce the asset. Cr Deferred tax asset (B/S), Dr Tax charge (P&L). It's not a cash tax or a mistake with their tax calculation for the year.
I'm merely a small-business-level non-tax-code-reading California bookkeeper, so perhaps I do not have enough external knowledge to understand the above accounting glimpse. It sure didn't make sense to me.
Pre-paid taxes are an asset. Deferred taxes would be a liability. A non-cash charge? I gather that means that this shows up in accrual accounting only.
Normally they would expect...? No, they should know the gross and pre-tax profit numbers. Is the imprecision theirs or the author's?

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring